Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />April 15, 2015 <br /> <br />Metropolitan Council <br />Attn: Housing Policy PlanBeth Rietz, Interim Community Development Director <br />390 Robert Street N <br />St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 <br /> <br />RE: Draft Housing Policy Plan (2015 Amendment) <br /> <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br /> <br />Thank you for the opportunity to review the regional Housing Policy Plan 2015 Amendment. Please include <br />our comments from our September, 2014 submitted comments as well. Some of our broader policy comments <br />are repeated in this response, with our revised comments in the bullet list below. The City supports the <br />Metropolitan Councils goals in promoting its housing goals. However, the City wants to ensure that it does <br />not result in mandates that might be in conflict with our existing land use goals. <br /> <br />General Assumption <br /> <br /> <br />The following comments are based on the assumption that no changes to our Future Land Use Map <br />nor our Housing Assistance Policy will be necessary in order to achieve the standards contained within <br />the proposed amendment to the Housing Policy Plan. <br /> <br />Comments on Amended Plan <br /> <br /> <br />Ramsey Appreciates the flexibility granted in the Housing Performance Scores that recognizes variation <br />in new construction levels and acknowledges policies that encourage affordable housing even if actual <br />construction not experienced in a given year. Ramsey supports the multiple thresholds, including the <br />threshold of up to 80% AMI, where this was previously 60% AMI. Finally, Ramsey supports points <br />awarded for all local tools provided and acknowledgment of other county, city, non-profit, and state <br />programs that provide tools to the City. <br /> <br />Ramsey supports the clarification on existing statutory requirements and submittal requirements versus <br />recommended strategies as it relates to the requirement to create a Housing Plan at the local level. <br /> <br />Ramsey supports the goals of affordable housing identified in the amendment plan so long as it is <br />consistent with the Cit <br />Future Land Use Map to increase areas of higher density that what is already currently identified. <br /> <br />Ramsey requests clarification on the definition of Affordable Housing as it relates to land use planning. <br />It is our understanding that the current definition is six (6) units per acre, but the amended plan notes <br />ranges from eight (8) units per acre to twelve (12) units per acre. Ramsey simply desires to better <br />understand how our allocation of affordable housing will be impacted by these thresholds based on <br />our current Future Land Use Map. Our current definition of Medium Density Residential is 3-7 units <br />per acre. Our current definition of High Density Residential is 7-15 units per acre. Our concern is that <br />Ramsey will not receive credit for areas currently shown as High Density Residential which we feel will <br />provide the necessary housing variety and is already currently in our land use plan. Perhaps our areas <br />of High Density Residential will quality in part two (2) of Option 2 (see page 11 of amended plan). <br /> <br /> <br />