Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />See Sect ion II -B, Extra- <br />territorial application. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.358 subd. <br />2a. <br />Sample public improvement <br />ordinance. <br />See Section VI—B <br />Development agreements. <br />When a city has opted to enforce its subdivision regulations extra - <br />territorially within a town, it must file copies of approved subdivisions in the <br />regulated area with the neighboring town. <br />VI. Public improvement requirements <br />The city subdivision ordinance may condition approval of an application <br />upon the construction and installation of needed public improvements for the <br />subdivision such as: <br />• Drainage facilities. <br />• Streets. <br />• Electric, gas, sewer, water, and similar utilities. <br />• Similar improvements. <br />The city may require that the developer install the improvements to the <br />city's specifications as detailed in the subdivision ordinance. For example, <br />the city may wish to specify the width and composition of any streets <br />installed by the developer. In addition, in order to ensure that the <br />improvements are installed correctly and completely, the city may condition <br />approval upon: <br />• Providing a cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable letter of credit, <br />bond, or some other type of financial security in an amount sufficient to <br />ensure that the required improvements will be completed as specified. <br />• The signing of a development agreement between the city and the <br />developer, which may be enforced by legal and equitable remedies in a <br />court. <br />Cities are not required to condition approval upon developer installation of <br />needed improvements. Cities may also install the improvement themselves. <br />Often these cities recoup the cost through special assessments on the newly <br />subdivided parcels. <br />Cities may prefer to install improvements on their own because it gives the <br />city direct control and supervision of a public improvement project, rather <br />than simply inspecting the work of a third -party developer. However, there <br />are some risks to this approach that should be considered by the city. <br />Specifically, when a city installs significant public improvements in a new <br />development, it typically expects to recoup its costs through special <br />assessments from buyers of the subdivided parcels in the development once <br />the project is completed. However, the city might experience unexpected <br />delays in cost recovery from assessments if <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: <br />Subdivision Guide for aties <br />4/15/2014 <br />Page 23 <br />