Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 4. 8. <br />Meeting Date: 02/10/2015 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Information <br />Title <br />Adopt Resolution #15-02-035 Accepting Feasibility Report and Ordering Public Hearing for IP #15-20, Jarvis <br />Street Reconstruction and Railroad Crossing Quiet Zone Improvements <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to accept the attached Feasibility Report and order a Public Hearing for February 24, <br />2015 for City Improvement Project #15-20, Jarvis Street Reconstruction and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad <br />Crossing Quiet Zone Improvements. <br />Background: <br />In June of 2014, staff was informed that the City of Elk River intended to reconstruct Jarvis Street between Trunk <br />Highway 10 and 165th Avenue as part of their 2015 Street and Utility Improvements project. This section of Jarvis <br />Street includes a segment approximately 3,800 feet long that is bisected by the political boundaries of the cities of <br />Elk River and Ramsey and is therefore mutually shared and maintained between the two cities. It also includes a <br />Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad crossing that is currently not designated as a whistle -free quiet zone. <br />A map showing the location of these improvements is included on the third page of the attached proposal letter <br />from the City of Elk River. <br />Elk River's staff explained that a joint meeting of the City Councils was held on May 9th, 2011, and that at the time <br />the Ramsey City Council provided verbal support for sharing in the costs of reconstructing the shared section of <br />Jarvis Street, as well as the railroad crossing quiet zone improvements. Based on the results of the joint meeting the <br />City of Elk River developed the Jarvis Street reconstruction and quiet zone improvements project for inclusion with <br />their 2015 Street and Utility Improvements project. While Ramsey's staff agreed that the condition of Jarvis Street <br />is such that it should be reconstructed in the near future, and that the Jarvis Street railroad crossing quiet zone <br />improvements would benefit City of Ramsey residents and businesses, these improvements were not included in <br />Ramsey's 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) so funds were not available to pay for the improvements in 2015. <br />It was therefore discussed that the reconstruction of the shared segment of Jarvis Street should be delayed until the <br />City of Ramsey was in a better position to fund our share of the improvements. <br />On August 15th, 2014, staff from both cities met again to further discuss the benefits and viability of the project, <br />including potential financing options. Elk River's staff noted their strong preference to reconstruct Jarvis Street in <br />2015 and that they may be able to pay the City of Ramsey's share of the costs up -front, and then allow Ramsey to <br />repay our share of the costs back over a 3 -year period. On August 28th, the City of Elk River provided the attached <br />proposal letter to the City of Ramsey formalizing their request for the City of Ramsey to share in 50% of the costs <br />for reconstructing the shared segment of Jarvis Street, plus 50% of the costs for the quiet zone improvements, and <br />that Elk River will pay for Ramsey's share of the costs up -front while allowing repayment over a 3 -year period. <br />Staff has since verified that repayment would be allowed to occur interest-free over calendar years 2016 to 2018, <br />which would not impact the City's adopted 2015 budget. <br />On September 16th, 2014 staff presented Elk River's proposal to the Public Works Committee for consideration of <br />recommending Council approval of the project, pending further direction from Elk River. It was discussed that <br />though the railroad crossing is located entirely within the City of Elk River, City of Ramsey businesses and <br />residents would share the benefit of the quiet zone so Elk River's request to share in 50% of the costs seems <br />