My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:59:46 PM
Creation date
5/14/2015 2:43:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/10/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
881
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notification: <br />NA <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />• Zoning/Use: Generally, the proposed development concept fits within the City's existing zoning regulations <br />(will require official site plan review and approval). <br />• Sale Price: The asking price for the subject property is $2.50 per square foot ($105,000). The offer price is <br />$2.29 per square foot ($95,000). The offer price is on the "high-end" of the City's adopted "deal -range" for <br />the subject property. Staff will recommend this offer price be accepted. <br />• Property Taxes: The proposed development is approximately 12,000 square feet. This building property will <br />generate about $31,000 in total property taxes (about 25% would be received by the City). <br />• Earnest Money: This PA does include earnest money ($3,000, 3.1%). Earnest money will become hard if the <br />initial closing date is extended by the buyer. <br />• Net Proceeds: estimated at $72,895; see attached for details. <br />• Closing Date: Closing is set for June 24, 2015. Attached to this case is a mock project timeline. <br />• Land Sale Policy: The attached PA generally meets the intent of the City's draft "Land Sale Policy" and has <br />been reviewed by the City Attorney, the City's real estate broker, and staff. Several changes (and <br />negotiations) have taken place between staff and the buyer. The buyer has been willing to make several <br />changes. <br />• Buyer: The buyer (Derek West of 24 Restore) has a history of providing business services to the City of <br />Ramsey. City staff has been impressed with the professionalism and reliability of Mr. West's company. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Approve (staff recommendation) <br />The proposed deal provides several benefits to the City: (1) tax base (2) land -sale proceeds (3) retain and <br />create jobs (4) quality project (5) positive momentum for development in Ramsey (6) the Council's general <br />goal of selling tax-exempt surplus City owned land will be realized. <br />2. Deny <br />Unless a specific hardship or concern regarding this PA can be identified by the Council, staff would not <br />recommend moving forward with this alterative. If the proposed agreement is terminated, the Staff would <br />restart marketing the subject property with CBRE. <br />3. Amend <br />The Council may wish to tweak or adjust provisions included in the proposed PA. Staff would be happy to <br />make adjustments as requested by the Council. <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Recommendation: <br />Please see observations section of this case for staff recommendations. This case reviewed by the EDA on February <br />05. The EDA passed a motion to recommend the City Council: <br />'Approve the attached purchase agreement with WESTCO Properties LLC. for .95 acres of City owned land <br />located at 6590 141stAve NW; contingent upon final review and amendments from the City Attorney." <br />The EDA did discuss a few areas of opportunity for process improvement related to purchase agreements for the <br />City: <br />(1) the City should develop a base/template PA; and, where possible, require it's use on future deals. <br />(2) the City needs to clarify their policy on who pays closing fees, title commitment, deed taxes, etc. <br />(3) the City needs to clarify their policy on site investigation authorization to prospect buyers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.