My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/24/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 02/24/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:02:10 PM
Creation date
5/14/2015 2:55:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/24/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not only create a better viewshed of the front facade from the street, it would also enhance the interior entryway of <br />the home itself. The Builder objects to this alternative, stating that a three -stall garage is necessary for the <br />marketing of this home. This home is being built on speculation at this point, without a buyer identified for the <br />home. <br />Staff did pose this question to the Builder, whom then requested that this case be brought forward to the City <br />Council in order to approve Alternative #1. <br />Alternative #3: Deny the plan. This plan is very similar to plans rejected by the City Council in the past, whereby <br />the area the Builder considers a Front Porch is truly just a covered entry with a major emphasis on the garage. <br />However, many of those previous models were split -entries with sufficient width in the lot to modify the plan to <br />create a full front porch. <br />Alternative #4: Direct Staff to review the requirements of the Design Framework to ensure that the document still <br />meets the policies of the City. Of note, this policy question was addressed by the City in 2011. At that time, the <br />policy of higher -quality architectural standards was upheld by the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff <br />would not recommend significantly revising this document again at this time. Staff will, however, be discussing <br />with the Planning Commission at their March meeting a better defined approach to the design review within The <br />COR for these situations, as well as architectural review for new developments within The COR. <br />Funding Source: <br />Processing this request is being handled as part of normal Staff duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />While Staff would prefer Alternative #2, knowing that there is a design alternative that would allow for <br />administrative approval that better meets the intent of the Design Framework, Staff would accept Alternative #1 <br />with City Council approval given the unique nature of this specific Property. <br />Action: <br />Motion to approve floor plan for Ramsey Town Center 10th Addition as presented for Lot 1, Block 2, Ramsey <br />Town Center 10th Addition only. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Floor Plan <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 02/19/2015 08:33 AM <br />Form Started By: Tim Gladhill Started On: 02/03/2015 11:46 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 02/19/2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.