Laserfiche WebLink
Ramsey Center Partnership. This ordinance is to be published in the Anoka <br />County Union and will take effect 30 days after the date of publication. <br />(Please refer to ordinance file for Ordinance #84-21). <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called for a roll call vote. <br /> <br />Council, ember $orteberg - Aye <br />Councilmember Van Wagner - Aye <br />Mayor Gamec- Aye <br />Councilmember Reimann - Aye <br />Councilmember Schlueter - Absent <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />COUNCIL.BUSINESS <br /> <br />~ RumRiver_Hills: <br /> <br />Mr. Dorn was present and stated that he is requesting Council to act on two <br />items: <br /> <br />Adopt Ordinance #84-20 conveying White Pines Estates Park land to the <br />Rum River P.U.D. developers. Ibis was on the December 18, 1984 <br />Council agenda but the wording of the ordinance was incorrect and it <br />was not acted on at that time. <br /> <br />2. Enter into a development agreement with Rum River Hills P.U.D. <br /> developers. <br /> <br />Mr. Dorn stated that the Rum River Hills P.U.D. developers have no problem <br />with the development agreement except in two areas: Exhibit C and "public <br />use" restriction on Outlot G. <br /> <br />The intent of Exhibit C is to ensure that the golf course will always be open <br />to and affordable to the general public but restricting fees to the average in <br />Anoka County is too restrictive. Mr. Dorn stated that one of the golf courses <br />in the County is owned by North American Life and Casualty and the other 3 are <br />owned by governmental agencies -- these agencies do not have mortgage payments <br />to meet and Rum River Hills P.U.D. does. Mr. Dorn requested that Council <br />approve changing the last sentence in Exhibit C to say that fees charged will <br />be con~nensurate with those in the Twin City area. <br /> <br />Council agreed that the wording, as is, could be forcing the developers to <br />operate their business at a deficit. <br /> <br />Mr. Dorn then requested that the Develol~nent Agreement not put a "Public Use" <br />restriction on Outlot G. ~he bank will not allow this as the property is <br />being used for collateral. The bank is concerned that in the event it has to <br />foreclose on this property, it will not want this "Public Use" restriction on <br />it. If Council agrees with no "Public Use" on Outlot G, one-half of the <br />course is restricted (Outlots A, B, D, & E) and one-half is not restricted <br />(Outlot G and Lot 2, Block 6). <br /> <br />Council consensus was that there was no problem lifting "Public Use" <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />