My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 12/16/1993
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
1993
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 12/16/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 12:42:44 PM
Creation date
4/1/2004 2:00:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
12/16/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Peterson felt he could do well in either type of election. He stated that thc <br />at large favors the person well known. He stated he would probably favor a ward or a <br />precinct so a citizen would know who represented them and who they should call. <br /> <br />Commissioner Donovan noted that none of thc present Council lives in the Urban Sep,,ice <br />Area and inquired if the citizens in this area feel they are not being represented. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson stated he has not heard anything in particular and that he feels the <br />entire City is represented. He stated one of the dangers of not being at large would be for a <br />Councilmember to become too localized neighborhood wise, and ignoring the City as a <br />whole. <br /> <br />Commissioner Donovan inquired if Council would go to the ward system, would also Park <br />Commissioners, etc. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding surveying residents for their opinion on ward versus at large <br />Council. The Charter also discussed pro-active and reactive and consensus is that they are <br />not going to "go out and create issues". However, this issue has been brought to the <br />Charter's attention and therefore they would be reacting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson reiterated his interest in a primary election. <br /> <br />Commissioner Donovan inquired about requiring a certain number of signatures backing up <br />the candidates running. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson thought that may help somewha[ <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen inquired if increasing the filing fee would make a difference to which <br />Councilmember Peterson stated it would not. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the voter turn out for primary elections. Consensus was that <br />since the turn-out is usually low, maybe requiring 100 signatures of supporters would be a <br />more simple route to follow and would still prove an actual interest in mrming for a seat on <br />the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson suggested putting an article in the Ramsey Resident regarding a <br />ward versus precinct election system and include a "cut-out" for citizen comment. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen inquired if the Charter Commission wants to explore this issue further. <br /> <br />Commissioner Goode stated he favors a ward system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Donovan stated he is in favor of discussing this further. The at large <br />appears to be functioning pretty well; however, he was not sure which system he would <br />prefer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Swokowski felt that the maturation of the City will put pressures on to <br />convert to the ward system and felt it is a good idea to explore this issue further. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson suggested developing pros and cons on each issue and getting that <br />information out to the citizens. He stated he is in favor of further discussion on this issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Netzloff stated he is also in favor of further discussion. <br /> <br />Charter Commission/September 16, 1993 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.