My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/25/93
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
05/25/93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2025 2:48:22 PM
Creation date
4/2/2004 7:49:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Finance Committee
Document Date
05/25/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
portion (up to 80 percent of total expenditures) of those expenditures for the project. <br />Minnesota has established an Agency Account to facilitate use of federal highway <br />funds by agencies other than the Minnesota Department of Transportation. This <br />Agency Account functions as a pool of money from which expenditures for project <br />costs are initial]), made. The pool is then reimbursed with federal funds. Without <br />access to this pool of funds in the Agency Account, project proposers would need to <br />individually front end the entire cost of a project's estimated cost instead of only the <br />local share. The State Attorney General has ruled that only cities over 5,000 <br />population, counties and state agencies may use the Agency Account. <br /> <br />5. Projects with an estimated total cost of at least $50,000. <br /> <br />Discussion...There are significant federal project processing requirements that come <br />with federal funds. These requirements translate into expenditures of time and money <br />on the parts of both the agency proposing/developing the project and the state agency <br />administering the federal funds for the project. Project proposers can "bundle" <br />projects together to meet this minimum. For instance bundled projects could consist <br />of signing and lighting a number of bike trails in several counties. Communities may <br />want to consider using joint powers agreements for implementing bundled projects. <br /> <br />6. Projects with a demonstrated relationship to transportation. <br /> <br />Discussion..,The IS'lEA requires that Enhancements projects be related to · <br />transportation. The FHWA memorandum providing interim guidance states: <br /> <br />"The definition of transportation enhancement activities includes the phrase, <br />with respect to any project or the area served by the project. Given its overall <br />context, we interpret this phrase to mean that the proposed transportation <br />enhancement activity must have a direct relationship to the intermodal <br />transportation system, but not necessarily to a currently planned highway <br />project. This relationship may be one of function, proximity, or impact. For <br />example, an independent bike path is a functional component of the intermodal <br />transportation system. Removal of outdoor advertising in the viewshed of a <br />highway is justified in light of its proximity. Retrofitting an existing highway <br />by creating a wetland to filter runoff from the highway would qualify based on <br />the impact of the highway in terms of water pollution. Once a relationship to <br />the intermodal transportation system is established, transportation enhancement <br />activities can be implemented in a variety of ways. They can be developed as <br />parts of larger transportation projects, as parts of larger joint development <br />projects, or as stand-alone projects." <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.