My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/02/93
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1993
>
02/02/93
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:22:39 AM
Creation date
4/2/2004 10:29:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
02/02/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Ramsey <br /> <br />15153 NOW'THEN BOULEVARD N.W., RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 ,, {612) 427-1410 <br /> <br />January 27, 1993 <br /> <br />Barton Sand & Gravel Co. <br />10633 - 86th Avenue North <br />Osseo, Minnesota 55369 <br /> <br />RE: Renewal of Mining and Grading Permit <br /> <br />Dear Ms. Sue Turner: <br /> <br />In 1988, Barton Sand & Gravel received a permit for the mining of sand and aggregate material in <br />the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27. At that time, a five sheet set of plans, <br />prepared by Land Graphic Design, was submitted as the basis for the permit conditions. <br /> <br />On December 31, 1992, the aforementioned mining and grading permit expired and you have <br />subsequently filed an application for the reauthorization of the permit based on the same set of <br />plans submitted for the original permit. In reviewing these plans, I have found a number of <br />conditions which have been modified since the original submittal and offer the following <br />information as the basis for requesting a modification to those original plans submitted: <br /> <br />· The existing grading plan should be revised to eliminate the grading necessary to <br /> accommodate the airport runway and the relocation of County Road #116. <br /> <br />Sheet 2 of 5, which contains the rough grading plan, shows cuts between two feet and 16 <br />feet are anticipated to bring the area down to an essentially "tabletop" fiat parcel. It is <br />suggested that a final grading plan be developed having a minimum grade of 0.5% as this is <br />the minimum acceptable grade to accommodated future roadways. This will enable the <br />property to be economically developed following mining activities. If the slope is directed <br />toward the wetland, future storm sewer costs can be minimized. <br /> <br />The existing grading plan includes a small area of deciduous trees adjacent to the wetland <br />which are located within the area to be mined. Presumably, this was acceptable due to the <br />fact that this area would need to be disturbed to accommodate the realignment of County <br />Road #116. Since it is now apparent that the realignment will not be necessary, these <br />deciduous trees should be preserved and the working area boundary should be relocated <br />accordingly. <br /> .,, <br />The submittal should be revised to show the extent Of the areas mined to date. The plan <br />should also include an example mining plan with erosion control and sedimentation <br />measures. I have some sample plans to assist you, if necessary. <br /> <br />Care must be taken to avoid any operation within a wetland area. Wetlands are no longer <br />identified solely upon the ordinary high water elevation. Type I Wetlands are often times <br />indiscernible to the layperson. We recommend an assessment of the wetland boundary <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.