Laserfiche WebLink
P.5×5 <br /> <br />1¢~. W£11i~m <br /> <br />~a~je 3 <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />Contain land acknowledged to have grandfather rights to less <br />than 1 per 10 acre density; <br /> <br />Be a reduction in previously approved density, rather than a <br />mere request to increase ~rom 1 in 10 acre density; <br /> <br />(6) <br /> <br />Contain at least 3.4 acres in high, well drained adjacent <br />land for each lot proposed, for use as backup drainfield <br />area. <br /> <br />I seriously doubt chat any parcel in unsewered Ramsey could come <br />close to meeting all six cri~eria, particularly items 4 and 5. <br />However, in the unlikely event that some project did meet all <br />six criteria, would that necessarily be a project the City would <br />not count? In other words/ we think that the 0nly precedent <br />being set is a good one. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />~1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />