Laserfiche WebLink
find "the best and the brightest, while also hiring professionals who <br />were reflective of Houston's racial and ethnic diversity," sa.es <br />Kfistaponis. Hired the ~ame day the city council passed the motion <br />to adopt zoning, she launched an aggressive nationwide search for <br />people and successfully built a 60-member zoning staff. ~We were <br />looking for people who wanted to be pan ofa ven' unique <br />challenge," she says. ~Here we were, the fourth largest cin, in the <br />U.S., trying to come to a consensus on how to zone years of <br />previousJy unregulated development." She was also fortunate to be <br />contacted by some planners, originally from Houston, who had left <br />to work for towns that had planning and zoning. <br /> Kristaponis recognized earl), on that a massive public education <br />effor~ was necessary to introduce the concept of zoning. She <br />coordinated an outreach effort that divided Houston into 15 study <br />areas and then divided thc nM' zoning staffinro teams assigned to <br />these areas. The teams' goals were twofold: thu' had to gather all <br />the physical data for their respective areas and, perhaps more <br />importantly, enlist the community's support to do so. Kriztaponis <br />says that "by having staffassigned m }ocal units, the3.' really got to <br />know their communi~, well, and they fostered credibilit), while <br />establishing a forum for local parnctpatmn. Staff met regularly <br />with local citizens and effectively became the city's liaison to their <br />assigned areas. <br /> The staff also developed a media effort, including a video that <br />explained what zoning was and why Houstonians should get <br />involved. The department supplemented daily press coverage of the <br />zoning issue by creating a newspaper insert called Houston Zoning. <br />It includes information on how zoning could affect neighborhoods, <br />businesses, and future development, and explains how people can <br />access information in order to understand the ordinance bener. The <br />insert also charts the progress of the new zoning team and reports <br />on local workshops and public hearings. Kristaponis and her staff <br />appeared on many local talk shows and met constantly with local <br />citizens groups and commercial organizations. "Having the <br />planning communi .ty monitor our progress under a microscope" <br />further publicized their efforts, she adds. <br /> Achieving even representation of Houston's racial, economic, <br />and geographic composition has also proved difficult. In 1991, <br />Mayor Kathy Whitmire renamed the planning commission the <br />planning and zoning commission. Its job was to monitor the <br />progress of and eventually approve the zoning ordinance. However, <br />council member' Ben Reyes, who represents minority communities, <br />later criticized the commission because its members did not reflect <br />his constituentT. In November 1992, Mayor Bob Lanier appointed <br />six new minority planning and zoning commissioners to more <br />approptiately represent minorities. Other council members <br />representing less populated areas also expressed concern that they <br />might not get adequate representation. Council member Jim <br />Greenwood, Houston's original grass-roots proponent' of zoning, <br />also expressed concern that new appointees, despite their minority <br />representation, might constitute a commission that overrepresents <br />Houston's comrnerdal interests. <br /> The planning and zoning commission appointed a zoning <br />strategies committee and a mapping committee. Composed of local <br />development professionals and citizens, these committees were <br />charged with the responsibility of writing the zoning ordinance and <br />developing the zoning map. The zoning strategies committee began <br />work on the draft ordinance in the spring of 1991 with a July 1992 <br />target date for completion. Completion of the first draft was <br />delayed because the committee felt it better to take the rime to forge <br />consensus on issues rather than be criticized for not doing so. To <br />the disappointment of many concerned homeowners, the zoning <br />strategies committ~ sought an extension until January 1993. <br /> <br />Last Chance <br />As plans for the ordinance progressed, applications for building <br />permits in residential areas rose. During the first six months of <br />1991, 73 applicants sought permits to convert or expand single- <br />family homes into commercial us~s. To protect predominantly <br />residential neighborhoods from becoming mixed-use areas, <br />neighborhood advocates proposed an interim moratorium that <br />would prohibit thc building, conversion, or development of <br />commercial businesses Oll lots smaller than two acres. Although <br />most cita' council members supported the measure, one opposed <br />it on the grouods that it would hurt many of tile mom-and-pop <br />businesses in his district. He later approved the ordinance. <br /> The council passed the interim residential protection ordi- <br />nance, which is intended to stay in place until thc zoning <br />ordinance is adopted. The interim ordinance imposes buffer <br />requirements and height restrictions on commercial property <br />that already exists next to residential propert).'. It would not bar <br />conversions already in progress or applied for before the ordi- <br />nance took effect. ]n addition, the interim measure includes <br />waivers that allow homeowners in neighborhoods already two- <br />thirds commercial to convert their homes into businesses. If the <br />surrounding property is less than two-thirds commercial or <br />nonresidential (for example, a church or a school), approval is at <br />the discretion of the planning director, based on factors specific <br />to each case. Moreover, the interim ordinance does not supersede <br />deed restrictions allowing home-operated businesses. <br /> <br />The Draft Ordinance <br />The zoning strategies committee presented its f'lrst draft of a <br />zoning ordinance to the planning and zoning commission in <br />early January. The commission unanimously approved it on <br />January 8 after 20 hours of public hearings. The city council's <br />acceptance followed on March 2. The document then became <br />the subject of six more public hearings, with the council <br />scheduled to vote on final approval this spring. Although a <br />referendum is also expected in January 1994, K.ristaponis feels <br />the public is solidly behind the ordinance. <br /> The ordinance proposes 12 zoning districts, tt has four <br />hierarchical residen~al districts that range from the most restric- <br />tive, R1 (single-family de~ached), which limits the number of <br />units per acre, to the least restrictive, RO (residential only), <br />which has no limit on the number of units. The next classifica- <br />tion is the urban neighborhood district. This category applies to <br />existing mixed-use areas with a predominantly residential <br />character. It has fewer land-use restrictions than the residential <br />districts, and it oudines scale and property-edge standards <br />nonresidential uses and large apartment buildings. <br /> The industrial district classifies all land where industry is <br />currently located. It includes standards based on the specific use <br />and requires buffers at the edge of the district. In addition, four <br />special districra accommodate land uses with special needs: <br />planned unit development districts, which allow unified control <br />over' a landowner's mixed development; special districts for areas <br />with unique characteristics such as universities or museums; <br />landmark or historic districts, which serve as overlays to provide <br />preservation designation for areas of cultural or historic signifi- <br />cance; and greenspace districts, which protect parks, open space, <br />and bayous from development. The major activiiy center (MAC) <br />d/st'r/ct classifies areas of large-scale, mixed-use, high-intensity <br />development such as Houston's Galleria, the Medical Center, or <br />its Greenway Plaza. <br /> Finally, there is the open designation. This category exists as an <br />%pen slate." The goal is to provide a mechanism for those market <br /> <br /> <br />