My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/23/1993
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1993
>
Agenda - Council - 02/23/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2025 3:49:57 PM
Creation date
4/6/2004 12:18:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/23/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES IN THE <br /> OF RIVENWICK; CASE OF FAYE CONSTRUCTION <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />PLAT <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As you may recall, early in 1991 we went through the rezoning process to amend the business and <br />residential districts in Rivenwick to coincide with the plat. The proposed ordinance to rezone the <br />property according to the plat was introduced by City Council. As a matter of policy, I don't bring <br />the ordinance back to Council for adoption until the final plat is adopted. I do this for two reasons: <br />a) I don't want to rezone the property until I am sure the plat will happen; and b) it makes for a <br />simpler ordinance if the legal descriptions of the property to be rezoned are based on the final plat <br />(lots and blocks) versus the metes and bounds descriptions. As you know, the plat did not receive <br />final plat approval until two years later and consequently what was approved in 1993 was <br />significantly different in terms of block and lot numbers to what was being considered in 1991. <br />Therefore, the rezoning ordinance introduced in 1991 is incorrect with respect to legal descriptions <br />and I have determined that it would be best to repeat the process based on the final plat as it has <br />been recorded. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The ordinance introduced in 1991 proposed to amend the zoning district boundaries to retain B-3 <br />Highway Business adjacent to Hwy. #10, B-1 Business south of the B-3, and R-1 Urban <br />Residential south of the B-1. When it became evident we had to reprocess the rezoning, the <br />Applicant requested that the proposal for B-1 Business between the residential and the B-3 District <br />be eliminated and that all of the commercial property be zoned B-3 Business. The Applicant's <br />request is based on the broader list of permitted uses in the B-3 District. City Staff feels that the B- <br />i District will serve as a good buffer between the residential portion of the plat and the more <br />intense B-3 Highway Business district. <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on February 2, 1993 and <br />recommended approval of the rezoning with the inclusion of the B- 1 Business District. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br />f) <br />g) <br />h) <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Present zoning configuration <br />Applicants proposed rezoning configuration <br />Staffs recommendation for rezoning configuration <br />Excerpt from City Code regarding B-3 and B-1 permitted uses <br />Findings of Fact g91-04-085 <br />Proposed findings of fact " ', <br />Proposed ordinance " <br /> <br />City Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the amendment to the <br />zoning district boundaries with the inclusion of the B-1 Business District. This zoning amendment <br />will also require rescinding Findings of Fact g01-04-085 and adopting up-to-date findings of fact. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.