Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # 4 <br /> <br />GRADING AND PAVING IMPROVEMENT OF BISON STREET N.W. <br />IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS #92-20 AND #92-23 <br /> By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the last City Council meeting held on February 9, 1993, two public hearings were held on the <br />above projects. Public comments were based upon a description of the project and its method of <br />financing as it outlined in the feasibility study. As a result of the comments made at the public <br />hearing, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for the northern project #92-20 as <br />presented, but directed changes in the scope of project #92-23 such that the south end of Bison <br />Street N.W. would terminate in a cul-de-sac and that 171st Avenue N.W. be removed as a link <br />with the Golden Eagle Estates subdivision to the east. I have revised the portions of the feasibility <br />study accordingly and have mailed it to known interested parties. A revised copy of the feasibility <br />study is attached to this case. <br /> <br />Prior to this meeting, a public hearing on Improvement Project g92-23 will be continued. <br />Following the comments, the Council shall again direct any changes it feels necessaD, in the <br />content of the feasibility study as this will be the basis for constructing project improvements and <br />allocating final costs. <br /> <br />In making a final determination on the Iraffic pattern configuration, I would like to the Council to <br />consider several points. First, I would point out the rationale for limiting the length of cul-de-sacs <br />stems from concern with problems associated with single access roadways. As the number of <br />persons exclusively served by a given roadway increases, the potential hazard of temporary <br />roadway blockages also increases. Blockages can result from numerous causes such as vehicular <br />accidents, utility breaks, a falling tree or pole, and pavement repairs. While such occurrences are <br />exceptional, they still must be regarded in terms of their effect on access by emergency police, fire <br />or ambulance equipment. For your consideration, the following is a comparison of single point: <br /> <br /> Alternative Single Access Residences <br /> <br />Through Sueet 0 <br /> <br />Cul-de-sac; 171st Ay. N.W. Open <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Cul-de-sac; 171st Ay. N.W. Closed <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />In cases such as this where a particularly long cul-de-sac is created, additional travel distance <br />caused by the cul-de-sac can be significant. Some residents will need to travel an additional mile <br />for each trip to the south. Assuming the average of the 25 single access residences will travel only <br />a half mile additional per trip and only half the trips will occur to the south, over 22,000 extra miles <br />can be expected to be driven collectively each year based upon the standard trip generation rate of <br />10 trips per unit. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to accept revised feasibility study on direct modifications. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: Copies also distributed to: <br /> <br />City Engineer <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br />CC: 02/23/93 <br /> <br /> <br />