Laserfiche WebLink
SCOPE & INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and associated costs for providing a <br />bituminous street to serve the segment of Bison Street N.W. between County Road #63 (173rd <br />Avenue N.W.) and the north line of the Trott Brook Ridge subdivision. Since 1989, three <br />previous feasibility studies have been prepared for this work. However, this project has not <br />proceeded to construction. Some elements of this project are controversial and a discussion of <br />these issues are presented later in this study. It is for that reason that this feasibility study is being <br />prepared as two separate projects which may be constructed concurrently or independently of each <br />other. The project lies within the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, and the parcels benefitting from <br />each project are identified in Exhibit A and B, respectively. <br /> <br />A public hearing on a feasibility study dated January, 1993 was conducted on February. 9, 1993 <br />and City Council directed that Project g92-23 be modified in scope. These modifications were <br />made in a revised feasibility study dated February 16, 1993 and discussed at a reconvened public <br />hearing on February 23, 1993. At the public hearing on February 23, 1993, testimony indicated <br />that parcels 3 and 4 of Project g92-20 had been combined, which would result in one fewer <br />assessable property on Project ~92-20. This revision of the feasibility study has modified Table 4 <br />to reflect this change. It was also directed by City Council that the scope of the project be modified <br />to include the land acquisition, but not the installation of the necessary fight-of-way to complete <br />Project g92-23 as a through street sometime in the future after the existing land owners no longer <br />reside on the property. This revised feasibility study will once again be subject to a reconvened <br />public hearing on March 9, 1993. <br /> <br />EXISTING CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The present street consists of a rural street section with a gravel and sand surface approximately 21 - <br />26 feet in width. The depth of the gravel surface was found to be between zero to three inches. <br />The history of the road fight-of-way is somewhat involved. In 1966, the roadway was intended to <br />run along the common border of two properties which occupied the entire north/south distance <br />between County Road #63 and the half section line of Section 9. At that time, each propertT owner <br />conveyed an easement to the other for access purposes from County Road #63 to the half section <br />line of Section 9. As parcels were created from these original two, the City began maintaining the <br />existing roadway. Since no formal deed was given to the City, its fight-of-way claim is based <br />upon State Statute 160.05(1) which deems streets to be public after six years of maintenance. The <br />City thus has a claim of two rods (or 33 feet) from the centerline of actual use. Nonetheless, both <br />Anderson Estates and Dellwood Hills subdivisions have subsequently dedicated 33 feet of fight-of- <br />way along the boundary between the original two properties which initially established the road. <br />In addition, the City entered into a stipulation in June 1982 with Leonard and Lorraine Hinton, the <br />property owners, at that time, of parcels one and two of Project g92-20 to place the roadway in its <br />originally intended location when it became paved. The actual location of the roadway lies as much <br />as 25 feet outside the intended right-of-way at County Road #63 and returns within the intended <br />fight-of-way by the time it reaches the intersection with 171st Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS <br /> <br />It is proposed to regrade to return the roadway to the center of its intended right-of-way north of <br />171st Avenue N.W. It is proposed to provide a 24 foot wide bituminous roadway with a four foot <br />gravel shoulder and a two foot deep drainage ditch on each side. While this does not meet the <br />suburban standard of a 30 foot roadway with a bituminous curb, it does provide a minimum cost <br />solution to paving this street and it is consistent with the road section in adjacent Golden Eagle <br /> <br /> <br />