Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # 4 <br /> <br />INTRODUCE PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND RAMSEY CITY CODE <br />CHAPTER 9 (ZONING AND SUBDIVISION), SECTION 9.02 (DEFINITIONS) <br />AND 9.11.02 (ACCESSORY USES) <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Subsequent to discussions at both the Planning Commission and City Council levels regarding the <br />appropriate procedure for determining lot size and the number of unlicensed vehicles that should be <br />allowed for outside storage, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed <br />ordinance amendments relating to these' issues. The proposed ordinance is enclosed for your <br />review and information. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />In summary, the proposed changes to these sections of the City Code are as follows: <br /> <br />l) <br /> <br />The definition of 'accessory building' was amended to clarify that attached garages are <br />considered accessory buildings and that the primary accessory building would be the <br />attached garage or in the absence thereof, the initial detached garage constructed on a <br />property. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />The definition for 'lot, minimum area of' was amended to eliminate the ability to include <br />road right-of-way when determining lot areas in the rural district. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />A definition for 'Personal Services' was added to City Code. Some of our zoning districts <br />list 'Personal Services' as a permitted use. Code currently does not have a definition for <br />'Personal Services'. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />Language was added to prohibit the showing for sale of more than one vehicle on property <br />not zoned for motor vehicle sales. <br /> <br />5) The ability to maintain one unlicensed vehicle on a property was retained. <br /> <br />6) <br /> <br />Upon the recommendation of the Building Official, Subdivision 3 of 9.11.02 was amended <br />so that the location of accessory buildings so as not to prohibit orderly resubdivision of the <br />property becomes the responsibility of the property owner rather than the Building Official. <br /> <br />7) <br /> <br />It was clarified that the maximum accessory building height regulations apply to detached <br />accessory buildings. <br /> <br />8) <br /> <br />For accuracy purposes, references to lot sizes were converted from in terms of acres to in <br />terms of square feet. <br /> <br />9) <br /> <br />The lot size threshold for having metal accessory buildings (pole buildings) was reduced <br />from 2.5 acres to approximately 2.29 acres, or 100,001 square feet as it is now referred to. <br /> <br />10) <br /> <br />A performance standard was added to require that any metal building (pole building) <br />constructed within 75 feet of a property line shall be designed with soffit, facia and cave <br />overhang. <br /> <br /> <br />