My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/13/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 04/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:25:15 PM
Creation date
4/9/2004 2:36:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/13/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Gamec indicated an appraiser would need to be acquired to determine the value of the <br />properties, taking into consideration the removal of the trees. With either situation there would <br />likely be some type of restitution, if the road were to go through it would likely be greater than if <br />they were to replant some trees. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook noted this area will never look like it did before the trees were removed. <br />l-lc indicated he would rather see the City negotiate for the road to go through than to take trees <br />out someplace else and put a longer road in. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen commented her feeling is that the City needs to make restitution for <br />the damaged property and needs to look at allowing Mr. Bauer access from 161st Lane. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec requested the Dusbabeks and the Kaas discuss the situation with Assistant <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon and City Attorney Goodrich. An appraiser can be <br />hired if that is agreed upon. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmcnnan questioned if it is being proposed that taxpayers' money be used to <br />solve this problem. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak stated there are two questions with this situation. First, this area did not <br />look wide enough to be a City street and more trees will likely need to be removed if it is <br />dedicated as a City street in the future. It is very important that these property owners know <br />about this. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised there is a 66 foot right-of-way. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak questioned who will be paying for this. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman suggested at this point the property owners might want to negotiate <br />for a private drive to go through here, but the City should not pay for this. <br /> <br />Mr. Bauer stated if an easement could be negotiated from the City standpoint he would have no <br />problem signing a statement that he would give the Dusbabeks and the Kaas a life lease on the <br />property. The property was never intended to be developed in the first place. He was required to <br />make a ghost plat by the City, but there was never any plan for this in the future. He has to set his <br />house so it stays out of the City right-of-way. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak stated this needs to be out on the table at this time regarding what the <br />possibilities could be with this road in the future. <br /> <br />Councihnember Strommen questioned if the decision would have been made to use City funds to <br />put in this easement if it was known it was not owned by the City, or would it have been <br />determi lied to have the road come in from 161st Lane. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/March 30, 2004 <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.