Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # <br /> <br />REVIEW PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO AMEND SIGN REGULATIONS <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As you may recall, the proposed sign ordinance has been before the City Council on several <br />occasions for introduction and adoption. Each time, the ordinance has been tabled for additional <br />review and amendments. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The major changes made to the proposed ordinance by the City Council are as follows: <br /> <br />Billboards prohibited. As the Planning Commission drafted the ordinance, <br />billboards would be allowed along Hwy. #10 as a principal use of property only. <br />Council has amended the ordinance to prohibit any new billboards. <br /> <br />Dealerships for new cars would not be permitted more free standing signs than <br />other businesses. Generally, all businesses are restricted to one free standing sign. <br />As the Planning Commission drafted the ordinance, new car dealerships would be <br />allowed to have one free standing sign for each make of automobile sold on the <br />property. To avoid discriminatory charges, the City Attorney has recommended <br />that new ear dealerships not be given any special sign privileges. If franchise <br />agreements for auto sales call for separate signs for each make sold, it can be <br />addressed with a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Reimbursement of costs incurred. Language was added to give the City the <br />authority to assess any costs incurred in removing various types of temporary signs <br />that the sign owner failed to remove within the specified time frame. <br /> <br />Standards for sign workmanship increased. Language was added to require that all <br />signs in excess of 16 square feet must be constructed and installed by a professional <br />sign company or contractor. <br /> <br />On the date of this writing, the City Attorney had not proposed any amendments to <br />Section 9.12.05, Subd. 2 (Political Signs). He will have a verbal report at the <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />1) <br />2) <br /> <br />Letter from Richard Mlodzik, Skoglund Communications, Inc., dated 9/30/93 <br />Proposed sign ordinance <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />City Staff recommends that based on the major changes made to the proposed ordinance, it be sent <br />back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for an additional public hearing. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />Direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing regarding the <br />proposed sign ordinance as it is now drafted. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: City Attorney <br />CC: 11/3/93 <br /> <br /> <br />