Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Riley asked about the potential of County turn back of Highway 5, which will <br />change the rules. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby provided a definition of a turn back and explained there is no set time for <br />that turn back to occur but it is within the County’s long-range plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated if the access is closed, what type of traffic calming can be <br />nd <br />considered at 152 and the frontage road at Highway 47. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained there is no study underway to look at <br />those alternatives but staff has discussed ways to reduce traffic conflicts and create calming. He <br />commented on the importance of considering a broader study for both of these corridors, as <br />identified by the Council in its Strategic Plan. He explained the importance of the land swap to <br />provide options and flexibility in the future. <br /> <br />Mayor Strommen stated that is an important point because there is no long-term plan for <br />Highways 5 or 47 so that corridor continues to be considered project-by-project rather than as a <br />vision. She preferred to close this access but noted that whether closed or left open now, it is a <br />decision that can be reversed. She commented on the importance of working with the County to <br />address this corridor. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated there will be a signal at Alpine Drive so that <br />will result in higher speeds past this driveway. Staff prefers to realign the access points but long <br />term, the Highway 5 corridor needs to be addressed. <br /> <br />Mayor Strommen agreed that if the access is closed now, it can be opened in the future if an <br />aligned access and part of a broader corridor plan that makes sense. <br /> <br />Councilmember Shryock agreed and welcomed this discussion to continue during Phase 1. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Shryock, seconded by Councilmember LeTourneau, to Adopt <br />Resolution #15-05-092 Granting Preliminary Plat Approval of Harvest Estates. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Riley stated a remaining issue is the work hours, which was <br />raised by several residents. He noted the allowable work hours are from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., which <br />he finds to be unreasonable so he would support amending the ordinance to shorten the length of <br />time. Mayor Strommen agreed and suggested it also be addressed in this Development <br />Agreement. Community Development Director Gladhill stated such an ordinance amendment <br />will take significant policy discussion about time thresholds, locations, and types of construction. <br />Neil Kryzaniak, NIK Management representing the developer, stated 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. is a <br />standard and something they can live with. Councilmember Shryock stated the motion to adopt <br />the resolution would result in closing the access. Community Development Director Gladhill <br />confirmed that the access is closed in the Preliminary Plat as drawn. <br /> <br />Mayor Strommen opened the floor to the audience. <br /> <br />City Council / May 12, 2015 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br /> <br />