Laserfiche WebLink
regarding the policies and acknowledged the difficult position the Commission is placed in <br />during this review period. <br />Commissioner Bauer stated that there are companies that gather consumer information that may <br />be useful to the City during this process. . <br />2.02: Discuss Approach for Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and the role of the different <br />Advisory Boards and Commissions during this process. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he has attended a number of the focus meetings hosted by <br />Community Development Director Gladhill and believes he does a great job of facilitating and <br />gathering public opinion. <br />Mayor Strommen encouraged everyone to think carefully about the questions, such as those in <br />the work planning document, to ensure that the questions are able to be answered by all <br />residents. She provided the example of using questions that everyone can answer rather than <br />higher level planning questions that could be intimidating. <br />2.03: Discussion on Potential Improvements to Other Planning Commission Topics <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the staff report. <br />Commissioner Bauer stated that perhaps it would be a good idea to do a review of all the <br />planning Ordinances as there are so many variances being issued, in order to better fit the intent <br />of the City within the Code. <br />Mayor Strommen suggested that staff use a prioritization level, beginning with those issues that <br />are constantly receiving variances and delaying review on Ordinances that may not need to be <br />amended. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that at one time there was a small architectural review board that <br />considered projects proposed for The COR and believed that perhaps there should be a <br />discussion on whether that group be re-established. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that board was removed during the <br />revisioning process as the City was very involved, to the point of hiring an architect to sit on that <br />board. He stated that staff agrees that there could be benefit to re-establishing some format of <br />that group to review applications within The COR. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that it may be beneficial to define a process where the <br />community could be divided up into sections, noting that while some development regulations fit <br />within certain areas of the City, those regulations do not fit well with other areas of the City. <br />City Council Work Session / May 26, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />