My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:03:34 PM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:06:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/14/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
699
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.08: Introduce Ordinance #15-07 Amending City Code Section 117-428 Entitled Towers <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation to <br />amend City Code Section 117-428, Towers, as requested by Connexus Energy, to increase the <br />maximum height of communication towers to 199 feet for entitles providing Stage 1 and Stage 2 <br />Improvements as required by City Code. Currently, the height limitation for communication <br />towers is 100 feet in all districts. <br />Councilmember Williams asked whether this is talking about cell towers. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated the overall ordinance establishes any <br />communication towers such as for emergency providers, cellular providers, or communication <br />providers. This amendment is for Stage 1 utility companies such as Connexus Energy, not cell <br />phone providers. <br />Councilmember Williams asked whether the amendment is for a tower that supported a Stage 1 or <br />2 improvements. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated it would be for the Stage 1 improvement and <br />since Connexus Energy provides electric service, it would be provided that exemption. <br />Mayor Strommen stated there would be a height limitation and location restrictions to commercial <br />and industrial districts. It would not be allowed in a residential district or park. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that is correct. <br />Mayor Strommen asked if there are locations at the edge of a permitted district that would result <br />in conflicts with residential districts. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated there are close locations but there are setback <br />distance requirements. He stated there is also an aesthetic consideration that the ordinance does <br />not address but he thinks this change will not create any more conflict than exists with 100 feet. <br />Councilmember Riley noted the Planning Commission suggests reconsidering the 100 feet and <br />asked if the City is missing out on opportunities that would be available if changed. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that came up when the Planning Commission <br />looked at what other cities provide, as it is common to see 150 to 160 feet. He stated the Planning <br />Commission wants to keep it at 100 feet in residential districts. Community Development Director <br />Gladhill stated the City does not get these requests frequently so he does not know that the City is <br />missing out on opportunities. <br />Councilmember Shryock asked staff to explain the process of ordinance adoption and opportunity <br />for public input. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.