Laserfiche WebLink
Table B-4. Calculation of Adjustments to Band Shares <br />Band <br />LAj <br />Share of <br />existing <br />affordable <br />housing in band <br />LBj <br />Share of <br />existing <br />affordable <br />housing in band <br />for average <br />community <br />Difference of <br />community from <br />average <br />(B—A)'—i <br />Golden <br />Valley <br />West St. <br />Paul <br />At or below 30% AMI <br />31% to 50% of AMI <br />51% to 80% of AMI <br />At or below 30% AMI <br />12.4% <br />21.9% <br />65.7% <br />8.5% <br />10.3% <br />28.1% <br />61.6% <br />10.3% <br />31% to 50% of AMI <br />34.4% <br />28.1% -6.3% <br />51% to 80% of AMI <br />57.1% <br />61.6% +4.4% <br />• Step 2: Calculate the share of the total allocation going to each band, adjusting for the <br />differences calculated in Step 1. <br />To determine the share of each community's allocation that should go to each band, we start <br />with the "equal share" factor from the regional Need (Column A in Table B-5), then add the <br />adjustment developed in Step 1. For example, 49.9% of the region's total Need lies in the 0- <br />30% band; this is the starting point for all communities. In Golden Valley, where the share of <br />existing affordable units in this band is higher than average, the adjustment is -2.1%, which <br />yields an adjusted share of 47.8%. In West St. Paul, where the share of existing affordable units <br />in this band is higher than average, the adjustment is +1.8%, which yields an adjusted share of <br />51.7%. The final shares, in Column D, reflect benchmarking to attain the regional Need in each <br />band. <br />12 Entries may not equal the difference between Columns A and B due to roundinq. <br />Page - 26 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />