My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:22:28 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 2:39:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Joint with EPB
Document Date
04/20/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill stated that two tools used in addition to the Strategic <br /> Plan for financial planning are the Capital Improvement Program and the annual budget. <br /> Planning starts with Strategic plan, then the CIP and is funded by the annual budget. The CIP is <br /> a planning document. <br /> Board Member Bentz asked about the City saying there is too much park property and looking at <br /> ways to sell it off. <br /> City Planner Anderson stated that the City did complete an inventory of city-owned land and <br /> identified land as not serving a purpose to be marketed for sale. <br /> Board Member Bentz asked about a requirement for set aside for development purposes. <br /> City Planner Anderson responded that there is a park dedication requirement that can be satisfied <br /> with land or cash or a combination of both. The general policy is to satisfy it with cash. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that City Planner Anderson's statement was <br /> correct that it is cash in lieu of land. It has to meet the master park and trail plan. He suggested <br /> looking at the term "cluster ordinances" and refining it or getting it out of the Comprehensive <br /> Plan. He explained the cluster concept. <br /> Commissioner Brauer stated that in the past, there was a misunderstanding between clustering as <br /> a strategy for developing green space and clustering as a way of cramming a lot of houses <br /> together that was never resolved. <br /> Board Member Bentz stated that a lot of people looked at it as poverty neighborhoods. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that this issue warrants some future <br /> refinement and strategy. Commission and Board Members agreed. <br /> Commissioner Brauer stated that it was ambiguous at the time and it hasn't gotten any less <br /> ambiguous. <br /> Board Member Bentz asked if there was a moratorium. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the ordinance was repealed. The only <br /> tool that can be used is a planned unit development. <br /> Commissioner Brauer stated that he liked Board Member Valentine's point about sustainability <br /> and that that value wasn't stressed enough in the last plan. He thinks it is crucial now to <br /> community survival. <br /> Board Member Valentine agreed with Commissioner Brauer and stated that there are plenty of <br /> people that think it is a dirty word. <br /> Commissioner Brauer spoke about the need for a discussion on what do we mean by it and how <br /> do we plan on doing about it. He talked about reviving the Andover ordinance model. He talked <br /> Environmental Policy Board/April 20, 2015 <br /> Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.