My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:06:09 PM
Creation date
7/17/2015 1:44:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/14/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
public improvements, Improvement Project 15-21 with the amendment of adding language that <br />clarifies the City will be paid upon the sale of each lot. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Johns and Shryock. Voting <br />No: None. <br />Mr. Kveton and Mr. Diers expressed gratitude for the staffs countless hours on this project and <br />the staffs patience. <br />6. COMMITTEE / STAFF INPUT <br />6.01 Review of Trail Maintenance Policy Framework <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report. He noted staff would like to develop the draft <br />policy and come back with a cost forecast with what it may cost to develop such a plan. He said <br />he was looking for input. <br />Commissioner Johns said this plan should be done. She noted the trails are getting to the point <br />that they cannot be maintained simultaneously. She said she prefers the PASER system since it <br />is familiar to everyone. <br />Commissioner Shryock stated she appreciates this policy framework. It is needed. She added <br />she is particularly interested in making routes as ADA accommodating as possible. She <br />recommended developing some sort of priority rating that would take into account not only the <br />condition of the pavement, but also the area. She suggested the trails by schools or major <br />thoroughfares could be considered to be on a priority list. <br />Chairperson Riley agreed with using the PASER rating. He asked if there was another system <br />that could be used as measurement. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer responded there are several systems that could be used, but <br />the only difference is the meaning of the numbers change. He suggested it is better to follow a <br />system that is familiar to all. <br />Chairperson Riley stated he would prefer to look at other seal -coating options. He said if there is <br />something else that maintains integrity and smoothness, it should be considered. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer noted sand is sometimes used instead of rock. <br />Commissioner Johns asked what the life expectancy is of the trails. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer explained it varies due to the base that is used for the trail. <br />Some trails have been around 25 years. He said some trails are a base of sand and are basically <br />constructed as roads so that heavy equipment for snowblowing can be used on them. He further <br />explained trails are made with different depths depending on proximity to tree roots and land <br />conditions. <br />Public Works Committee / May 19, 2015 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.