My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:06:09 PM
Creation date
7/17/2015 1:44:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/14/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I have considered the issues associated with the installation ea sidewalk along the north and <br />east sides or Andric Street and 164t Lane in association with a street reconstruction work on <br />these streets. I want the City Council to know that I ani: <br />In support of'a sidewalk in this location <br />In opposition ()Ca sidewalk in his location <br />Undecided or n'eut:r 1 on this <br />My property is on the: ast or north <br />Other t:';ctirnmerits: <br />REC'D JAN 2 9 2009 <br />wet or south side catthe .street. <br />S,, 6; yr v -1,4 <br />4-k )c ( <br />t I- 5 <br />I have considered the issues associated witli the installation or a sidewalk along the north and <br />east sides or Andric Street and 154" Lan.e, in association with a Street reconstruction work fm <br />these streets, i want the City Council to know that 1 am: <br />In support of a sidewalk in this location <br />In opposition of a sidewalk in this location <br />Undecided or neutral on this issue <br />My property is on the: Veast or north west or south <br />Other Comments: <br />side or the street. <br />We know of many neighbors that were pressured and/or mislead so much by the homeowners' assn, that they signed <br />the opinion surveys in direct opposition to their true opinions. Anyone knowing the facts is left with one logical choice — <br />do the sidewalks now. The goals of Ramsey (and their plans for Northfork) Include installation of walkways at some <br />time; installing them now would cost less (overall costs will increase in the future, and certain things would have to be <br />paid for two times - lawns, sprinkler, etc.); installing them now will mean zero additional cost the homeowners; there <br />will be less inconvenience to the community having roadwork and sidewalks done at t(ie same time; it is safer to walk <br />ori a sidewalk than on a roadway; Pualic safety should ae our government's main objective — from that standpoint, there <br />can be no argument. People who argue that it is fiscally irresponsible to spend money on this improvement, are <br />forgetting that money will be spent on these walkways at some point, and that at that time the money could come from <br />their checking accounts instead of MSA funds! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.