Laserfiche WebLink
Our Mistionc To work together to reipoiibly grew our comma nityr, and to provide quality, cert-oliBcdwe, and efficient government services. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 6. <br />Meeting Date: 07/14/2015 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Recent Feedback Concerning Buildable Area on Parcels with Floodplains and Wetlands <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review resident feedback regarding the amount of remaining buildable area on certain <br />residential parcels after areas of wetlands and floodplains are subtracted. Staff notes an increase in the number of <br />concerns raised by residents most notably in the Brookfield and Sweetbay Ridge developments, but <br />communitywide as well. This policy issue can also be seen in some high water times when primary structures are in <br />close proximity to floodplains and wetlands. <br />Potential outcomes of the policy discussion range from taking no further action to amend City Code to making <br />certain amendments to City Code to ensure a minimum amount of buildable area to the benefit of the ultimate home <br />owner. Staff believes that this policy issue has risen beyond just a small number of isolated incidents to at least a <br />level to bring to the attention of the City Council. This policy issue is especially evident in Sweetbay Ridge, and to <br />a slightly lesser extent in Brookfield, where it appears there is a high number of wetland encroachments in rear <br />yards. This issue has also surfaced at time of sale due to proximity to floodplain boundaries and potential wetland <br />impacts during due diligence periods. <br />Staff acknowledges the previous wetland protection ordinance of the City Code repealed circa 2009 and notes that <br />none of the alternatives noted below include these previous restrictions. Staff is not suggesting that any policy <br />change needs to be made. However, Staff believes it is relevant to bring the topic to the City Council's attention. <br />The intent of the direction of this case would be to simply direct Staff to work with the Environmental Policy Board <br />(EPB) and Planning Commission to brainstorm 1) if policy changes are needed and 2) if so, ideas of potential policy <br />changes. <br />Notification: <br />No notification is required at this time as this is for discussion purposes only. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The policy issue appears to arise after the initial construction of the home with the expectation of the ultimate <br />resident that future improvements, such as a deck and/or detached accessory building, could be added to a property. <br />The initial, principal structure meets all current and applicable bulk standards. However, the presence of <br />floodplains, wetlands, and/or storm sewer infrastructure can greatly restrict the actual buildable area of a lot for <br />future improvements and rear yards. The builder has met all minimum requirements to obtain a Building Permit. <br />However, the ultimate home owner is not able to utilize the rear yard as expected due to non -developable portions <br />of the lot. The City has a number of examples where the actual lot size is approximately one (1) acre in size, but the <br />developable area is less than a quarter (1/4) acre in size. <br />