My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:06:09 PM
Creation date
7/17/2015 1:44:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/14/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Dominium is aware of the City's request; and has indicated they would be willing to add owner equity to <br />the project. Dominium is aware of the City's policy for 10% owner equity. <br />4. Dominum has indicated they have tried to meet the request for a mixed use building in the past, in other <br />communities. Unfortunately, they've repeatedly had bad experiences with this practice. Dominium is not <br />comfortable with including this request in their model. Dominium has noted, if the Council accepted the <br />request in item 2 above, a mix of uses would naturally occur within a specific block. If the desire of the <br />Council is to require a mixed-use building if financial assistance is granted, than the Developer should focus <br />on parcels within the COR -4c district which allows for the desired density, but has a vision of exclusive <br />residential uses (not a primary vision of a vertically mixed-use building). <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Attached to this case is the original Letter of Intent (LOI). With the original LOI in mind, consideration of the June <br />09 Council counter-offer outlined in the background section of this case, and the Dominium responses outlined in <br />the background section of this case, Staff is seeking direction from the City Council on how to proceed with <br />negotiations. Listed below are alternatives: <br />1. Generally accept the Dominium offer, direct Dominium to draft an updated LOI <br />(+) sale of City owned land, $4.50 per square foot, tax exempt property back on the tax rolls <br />(+) roof tops, moderate level of discretionary income, drive retail and development momentum <br />(+) quality building, quality architecture <br />(+) hidden structured parking (first investor to -date to provide, helps meet original vision of The COR) <br />(+) #1 priority in City's Housing Subsidy Policy, provides senior independent (not assisted living) specific housing <br />within The COR <br />(+) quality developer, quality long-term property manager, good references/ reputation <br />(+) helps achieve density and rooftops guided for The COR/ Ramsey Station <br />(+/-) compromise regarding location, still allows for mix of uses (see attached concept), COR -2 Zoning currently <br />(can/ needs to be amended) <br />(-) requires assistance (about 15 years of TIF) <br />(-) low/moderate income project in close proximity to similar product The COR (senior independent living), where <br />the City's housing goals desire to better mix income levels versus concentrate in single location <br />2. Generally oppose the Dominium offer, don't direct Dominium to draft an updated LOI <br />Benefits and drawbacks are opposite as outlined above. <br />3. Develop a counter offer <br />Council may wish to develop a counter offer. Please see background section for discussion points. <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Recommendation: <br />Please see alternatives section. Based on discussions with Dominium, the Council and the EDA, Staff believes the <br />major remaining discussion point on this project is the location. Staff desires discussion, based on this previous <br />feedback, if the proposed compromise that would allow a portion of the undeveloped lot to develop as retail in the <br />future is an acceptable approach. <br />Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.