Laserfiche WebLink
MISCELLANEOUS <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann stated with regard'to the Dickenson Lines issue, the <br />who truth should be brought out by the newspapers, that Princeton's offer <br />to Dickenson was not a freeby and Princeton had these funds set aside to <br />help businesses get started in their community. <br /> <br />Case ~4: Zoning Enforcement (Vehicles And Wood Piles, Etc.): <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that there are 3 or 4 major violators in RamSey. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich informed Council of the legal process that would be <br />involved: gather information, have the complaint signed by a neighbor or <br />City, go to court, court will probably allow party 30 days to clean up, <br />if the party does not comply it goes back to court for enforcement which <br />could be a sentence or a fine. <br /> <br />Council consensus is to start legal proceedings against major violators of <br />Ramsey Zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Case #5: Legal Items: <br /> <br />B. Site P: <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich presented potential configurations for Site P <br />and stated that the County would like input from Ramsey on these. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich stated that the County is considering meeting with lot <br />owners in Peltzer Addition, Block 6, Lots 1 and 2 and maybe 6, regarding <br />whether or not they want to be included in the buffer zone. The results <br />of this meeting will be brought back to Ramsey City Council for review <br />and then Council can adopt a resolution endorsing a configuration. <br /> <br />County Commissioner Haas was present and stated that these potential <br />configurations are in response to Ramsey's request to pull Site P. <br />Ms. Haas requested from Council some indication as to whether or not <br />this idea has some appeal. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he would prefer that the landfill be completed <br />and over with, but as of right now this seems like a workable plan. <br />He also commented that if Ramsey doesn't start considering some of <br />the positives and proceeding to endorse an alternate, Ramsey could <br />be stuck with a site three times bigger. <br /> <br />Councilmember Van Wagner stated that of all the plans she has seen so <br />far this seems to be the best and that she thinks it is just great that <br />the County is contacting the three affected homeowners and any decision <br />she makes will be based on the input from these three homeowners. <br /> <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL INPUT <br /> <br />Councilmember Schlueter stated that she has received calls regarding the <br />Dickenson Lines issue and that she herself is just not clear on what actually <br />happened and why Ramsey couldn't accomodate Dickenson and suggested that a <br />article be published in the Union to clear up some of the questions. <br /> <br />Sp C/August 11, 1983 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />