My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/16/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/16/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:44:52 PM
Creation date
4/16/2004 9:09:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/16/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
money into this. Some action needs to occur; either the Council can determine not to <br />go forward with the project or decide to go forward with the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated it was clearly stated in the Council's acceptance of <br />the feasibility study that this does not mean they are agreeing they will go forward <br />with the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated if in fact they do not allow other growth and <br />development and the cash flow that brings to the City he guarantees they will have to <br />change their plan on the growth of Town Center or the development will go too high; <br />it depends on the pace at which they put it forth. It can stand on its own weight with <br />the City Hall inside. This is their financial tool for parks and trails and some of the <br />infrastructure they want to do in the City. If they do not have this money behind them <br />they will have to take a slower approach to Town Center. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she does not want to start using Town Center as the <br />vehicle for which they have to start doing things. She is not saying she never wants to <br />see this part of the City develop, she is saying a couple of months ago they came to an <br />agreement on a five year plan, which was to do a planning process on the rest of the <br />City. Now they are saying they should go forward with the pipe. She wants to see an <br />orderly kind of development in the rest of the City before they start putting sewer into <br />individual parcels. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman indicated staff can put together a case on the <br />comprehensive planning process that includes environmental and AUAR studies. It is <br />clear there is not a consensus on all issues. The feasibility study will be placed on the <br />agenda separately for the Council to discuss. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated to think the commercial node would be the catalyst to <br />move the pipe up is premature. She is not against development, but she is for good <br />planning. There are parts of the City that are not as well planned as they could have <br />been, and she wants to avoid that in the future. They want to make sure when the <br />pipe goes in it goes exactly where it should go so it services everyone, not just that <br />little core. If this has to wait six months, it has waited three or four years already. <br />People can sell their property at any time and it is not the City's job to evaluate <br />anyone's property. <br /> <br />FUTURE TOPICS <br /> <br />No future topics were discussed. <br /> <br />MAYOR AND COUNCIL <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/March 16, 2004 <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.