My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/16/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2015
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/16/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:45:03 AM
Creation date
8/17/2015 9:30:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/16/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Diers stated he did not want to hang onto this for the next few years, either. He noted the <br />market is strengthening. He also pointed out this is not a development that would interest many <br />developers as it is only seven homes. <br />Chairperson Riley asked where in the agreement it states the City would be paid as lots are sold. <br />He said he only noted where it said the City would be paid twice a year; in October and May. He <br />asked if the language could be added relating to payment as the lots are sold. <br />City Administrator Ulrich answered that language could be added. He explained the agreement <br />is that the percentage that each lot is assessed would define the amount that is paid when the lot <br />is sold. <br />Chairperson Riley questioned whether the City was the Bank's only viable source of financing. <br />Mr. Diers responded that is was. He said they cannot take out a loan from another bank and they <br />cannot self -loan. He added that the assessments must be clear to deliver the title. <br />Councilmember Shryock asked if there are any repairs that need to be done in the adjacent <br />existing neighborhood and if they would be done as this development is in progress. <br />Public Works Superintendent Reimer explained this development should not have much of an <br />affect on the existing neighborhood. The roads in that neighborhood have recently been <br />sealcoated, and the drainage is good. <br />Chairperson Riley noted the assessments will average to $85,000 per lot. The allocation varies. <br />He inquired if the amounts made sense with the anticipated selling price. <br />Mr. Diers responded the higher value is placed on Lot 1, which has better access and view of the <br />river. He stated he would like to see someone take interest in lot 7, so they could put up a model. <br />The property would show better. He explained they are planning to add berming, and trees to <br />create a buffer from the industrial area. This will add to the value of the homes, and ultimately <br />to the tax base. <br />City Administrator Ulrich commented this has been a patient developer. He said this may not <br />have been developed if were in the private sector. He noted there have been many issues with <br />this property over the years. There have been several potential uses for it. This plan capitalizes <br />on the river, as well as the trail. The development will hopefully raise the level of the homes in <br />the area. This unique project with the bank backing it makes it less of a precedent -setting <br />development for the City. This project is relatively small, which means the bank can do it as a <br />project and get it done in 3 years. The Finance Director approves of the financial situation. The <br />City will get its return back, with 3.5% interest, which is more than with other investments. He <br />noted the language to clarify the timing of paying assessments will be added to the agreement. <br />Motion by Councilmember Johns, seconded by Councilmember Shryock to recommend that the <br />City Council approve the draft Assessment Agreement for Ridgepoint residential development <br />Public Works Committee / May 19, 2015 <br />Page 4of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.