Laserfiche WebLink
observation wells are sparse CWI drives head during calibration. While broad spatially, CWI data are <br />uncertain due to the following: <br />• Inaccurate water -level measurements <br />• Inaccurate well location <br />• Inaccurate elevation <br />• Unstable water level at the time of measurement <br />• Misidentification or incorrect assignment of hydrostratigraphic units in databases <br />• Seasonal pumping affects of water levels <br />• Long-term changes in water levels due to climate or growing water demand <br />The single biggest contributor to predictive uncertainty is uncertainty in future water demand. We do not <br />know for sure how many people will live in the metro, where they will live, how much water they will <br />use, or if sources of water will remain the same. This is where input from City Administrators and <br />Engineers comes in. We recognize that no one knows the city and its water supply better than the city <br />or utility staff. Therefore, we have been asking for input on population, population served, per capita <br />water use, water sources, and well locations. <br />It is hard to predict water use given all the variables, but historically water use has been in about a +1- <br />20% range, which is why we are presenting results with this range. <br />Calibrated MM3 <br />The steady-state Metro Model 3 model estimates average water levels between 2003 and 2011, within <br />a range (plus or minus) about 17 feet. <br />Because it is a steady-state model, it does not represent water levels for a specific day and time. <br />Instead, it is intended to illustrate where aquifer water levels will come to equilibrium under a given <br />water budget (recharge, pumping, baseflow). In other words, it illustrates where things will ultimately <br />end up. <br />In general the model uncertainty is spread fairly evenly throughout the model. Areas where model <br />uncertainty appears to be concentrated are: <br />• Northwest Hennepin County <br />o Areas of faulting <br />o Geologic atlas updated in 1989 <br />o Few observation wells <br />• Eastern Scott County <br />o Areas of faulting <br />• Rice County (directly to south) geologic atlas updated 1995 <br />o Few observation wells <br />• Le Sueur County (note: not in 7 county metro, directly south of Scott County) <br />