Laserfiche WebLink
By decreasing the summer versus winter monthly ratio to 1990s levels, the region could achieve a <br />15% reduction in total water use, reducing the need for infrastructure expansion for many <br />communities. <br />Measures <br />• Regional average total municipal water use per person <br />• Winter versus summer water use <br />• Regional average residential water use per person <br />Increased collaboration <br />Desired Outcomes: <br />That work groups are formed and active in all hydrogeologic subregions and include participation by all <br />water sectors including regulatory agencies and public and private entities, and supported by the <br />Metropolitan Council. <br />That all public water suppliers have emergency supplies through interconnectivity or multiple sources <br />of water, including emergency connections. <br />As the Metropolitan Council works with local partners to identify and implement the best options for <br />their situations, subregional feasibility analyses will be done, guided by local work groups, to evaluate <br />the costs and benefits of different approaches. This information can inform local water supply plan <br />updates, permits, environmental review documents, county groundwater plans, and source water <br />protection plans, as appropriate. Figure 27 shows participating communities in the work groups. <br />Measures <br />• Number of partners participating in Council -facilitated work groups <br />• Number of partnerships reported in local water supply plans (updated on 10 -year cycle) <br />• Number of subregional solutions acted on and implemented <br />WATER SUPPLY MASTER <br />PLAN- Draft June 2015 <br />61 <br />