My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 06/04/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2015
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 06/04/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:55:52 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 8:21:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
06/04/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Patrick Brama <br />Housing Assistance Policy Measures <br />May 27, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br />per unit if other public funding sources are being utilized (policy should state <br />that developer will maximize use of grants and other funding sources to the extent <br />available). We recommend a cap of City funds at $15,000 to $20,000 per unit If no <br />other public funding sources are available, knowing that it does not provide as <br />much flexibility. <br />• Maximum City participation: Another way of capping assistance can be through a <br />maximum percent of total development costs (TDC). We would recommend a cap of <br />5% of TDC, with other public participation (This may work well for larger projects, <br />but could be problematic for smaller projects). We recommend a cap of City funds <br />at 10% of TDC If no other public funding sources are available. <br />Affordable Housing Measures <br />Most affordable housing is being built using either 4% or 9% tax credits. This model <br />generates tax credit equity, but generally includes very little (if any) developer equity. For <br />this reason, rate of return is not a useful measure. Others options include: <br />• Limit TIF assistance: Limit TIF to 15 years, rather than the full 26 allowed by law. <br />Since most city involvement in these types of projects includes TIF, this can be <br />useful. Rationale for this approach is: <br />o Affordable housing projects within the Metropolitan Area are being <br />constructed with this term of TIF <br />o The duration of assistance is generally commensurate with the required <br />affordability period for tax credit projects <br />o There is clarity up front with the developer about what the city will do <br />o The developer can structure other financing/grants around this <br />o Exceptions can be made for extraordinary circumstances <br />• Waiver of Fees: Tax Credit projects typically request that a city waive certain fees <br />such as park dedication, building permit and any city WAC fees and city SAC Fees <br />(above what the Met Council charges. We recommend that the City include in its <br />policy what fees it is willing to waive. Typically most cities' WILL NOT waive building <br />permit fees. City's MAY waive park dedication fees if they view the development will <br />not have an impact on parks (i.e. senior independent or senior assisted living). Also, <br />some Cities have been willing to waive WAC fees and City SAC fees (dependent <br />upon the liquidity of these enterprise funds). <br />• Equity Requirement: As noted, for the majority of the Tax Credit projects, the <br />developer does not have any of their own cash in the deal (equity). The City may <br />want to consider requiring that the developer have a minimum amount of equity so <br />they have something at risk. We would recommend a minimum of $50,000 to <br />$100,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.