My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 07/09/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2015
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 07/09/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:55:18 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 8:26:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
07/09/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Walser Auto Sales, Inc. v. <br />City of Richfield, 635 <br />N.W.2d 391 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />2001); aff'd, 644 N.W.2d <br />425 (Minn. 2002). <br />Chenoweth v. City of New <br />Brighton, 655 N.W.2d 821 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2003). <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 469.1812 to <br />469.1815. <br />Cities should use extreme care in establishing a TIF district and should <br />follow all procedural requirements; otherwise, a court may find the district <br />was not properly established. In one case, a TIF district was not properly <br />established where minimal effort was made to ensure the thorough <br />inspection of the properties, inaccurate methodology was used to establish <br />the condition of the buildings, and the buildings found structurally <br />substandard were not reasonably distributed throughout the district. <br />In another case, a cause of action for inverse condemnation does not arise <br />where a city's involvement with an adjacent property owner's <br />development consists of establishing a TIF district, entering into a contract <br />with a private developer specifying the size and value of structures to be <br />built, and providing for substantial city assistance to facilitate <br />development. <br />Given the complexity of the laws governing the use of TIF, cities or HRAs <br />should not undertake this method of financing community development <br />projects without the advice of an attorney and professional consultants. <br />F. Property tax abatement <br />A city may use this development tool to segregate some or all of the taxes <br />(or the increase in taxes) it imposes on a parcel of property if the city <br />expects the benefits of the proposed abatement agreement at least to equal <br />the costs of the proposed development. The term "abatement" is somewhat <br />misleading, as in most cases the tax is not forgiven; it is paid normally, but <br />the amount of property tax levied by the city is used to pay for the bonds. <br />The city must determine that the agreement is in the public interest <br />because it will increase or preserve tax base, provide employment <br />opportunities, provide or help acquire or construct public facilities, help <br />redevelop or renew blighted areas, or help provide access to services for <br />residents of the city. Property taxes in a TIF district cannot be abated <br />unless the period of the abatement will not occur until after the district is <br />decertified. <br />A resolution must be adopted after notice and public hearing, specifying <br />the terms of the abatement. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 11/4/2014 <br />Community Development and Redevelopment Chapter 15 1 Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.