My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:07:50 PM
Creation date
8/26/2015 9:38:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/25/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
593
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 08/25/2015 <br />By: Geoff Solomonson, Community <br />Development <br />4. 10. <br />Information <br />Title <br />Adopt Resolution #15-08-190 Approving the Site Plan Amendment for Town Center Gardens 3rd Addition (to <br />remove the patio areas and half wall between the center units on Lots 1, 3, and 4, Block 1, Town Center Gardens <br />3rd Addition - 14787, 14851, 14875 Olivine St. NW; Case of Distinctive Living Rentals, LLC) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a request for an amended Site Plan. The request is to eliminate an outdoor <br />patio wall and concrete patio areas between the center units of three (3), eight -unit townhomes. Distinctive Living <br />Rentals, LLC (the "Applicant") is currently constructing an eight (8) unit townhome building on on Lot 3, Block 1 <br />Town Center Gardens 3rd Addition and also owns Lots 1 and 4, Block 1 Town Center Gardens 3rd Addition <br />(together, the "Subject Property"). The Applicant is seeking this amendment of all three (3) parcels and has <br />identified reasons for the requests as size (or lack there of for the patio areas), access, and placement of utilities. <br />Notification: <br />Notification is not required when considering an amendment to a site plan. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Applicant is seeking this amendment due to the limited size of the area, a six (6) foot by twelve (12) foot area, <br />which will be further reduced once the A/C unit and individual gas meters are installed in this area. Gas meters <br />were previously banked together on an end unit, but are now being placed in front of each individual unit to avoid <br />the inefficiency of running gas lines out and around to each unit. The patio areas also have no direct ingress or <br />egress from this space; rather, an occupant would need to walk out and around a wall to enter the patio area. The <br />Applicant also stated that it was his opinion that that the space may also be unsuitable for using a grill, as it has a <br />greater potential to melt the siding due to being a small space. <br />The Applicant is proposing to eliminate the impervious surfacing and replace it with landscaping. Proposed <br />landscaping will need to comply with the City's landscaping standards with regard to acceptable/preferred species <br />and size (twenty-four [24] inches in height at time of planting for shrubs). <br />This case was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 6, 2015 with some discussion, but with no public <br />input. The Planning Commission recommended approving the Site Plan amendment request under Resolution <br />#15-08-190. <br />Alternatives <br />Option 1: Adopt Resolution # 15-08-190 approving the request to amend the Site Plan. The size of each patio area is <br />small and lacks direct ingress and egress. This area will be further reduced after the placement of the A/C unit and <br />individual gas meters, leaving its functionality somewhat questionable. Thus, replacing this hardscape with <br />landscaping may serve as a more desirable option to future occupants. Staff supports this option. <br />Option 2: Deny the request. The requested amendment is minor in nature and does appear to significantly alter the <br />exterior aesthetic of the building(s). Additionally, the patios were not required by Zoning Code, so the request does <br />not represent a deviation from any zoning requirement. The City would need to draft findings specifically <br />identifying the reasoning to deny this request. Staff does not support this option. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.