My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:07:50 PM
Creation date
8/26/2015 9:38:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/25/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
593
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 08/25/2015 <br />Submitted For: Patrick Brama, Administrative Services <br />By: Patrick Brama, Administrative Services <br />7. 9. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review and Adopt Future Business Park Infrastructure Analysis <br />Purpose/Background: <br />PURPOSE: <br />The purpose of this case is to adopt a report from Bolton & Menk on required infrastructure improvements to the <br />City's future business park. <br />Due to the complexity and length of this report, Staff would like to provide an opportunity for Bolton & Menk to <br />present this report to the City Council from a "high level" perspective. This will allow for face-to-face dialog and <br />questions. <br />Background (on this study): <br />Please see attached Request for Qualifications (RFQ) document. This study was authorized by the City Council on <br />March 10, 2015. <br />Next Steps/Process: <br />Please see attached process outline. If the attached report is adopted, staff intends to initiate step #4 as stated: <br />Develop Economic Development Analysis <br />Staff intends on contracting out an Economic Development Analysis to include the following items: <br />i. cost -benefit analysis (does this make sense for the City of Ramsey?) <br />ii. market analysis (is this viable in the marketplace?) <br />iii. comparison chart to other cities (what are other cities doing, including financing?) <br />iv. list of alternatives and recommendations (what options exist for moving forward?) <br />Notification: <br />NA <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />NA <br />Funding Source: <br />TIF 1 <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff has reviewed and revised this document. The Economic Development Authority (EDA) has reviewed this <br />document two times. Additionally, the Planning Commission has also reviewed this document from a compliance <br />with the Comprehensive Plan perspective. Attached are EDA minutes from July and August and the Planning <br />Commission Minutes from August. Staff and the EDA recommend moving forward with adopting this report. <br />Please see attached process outline for next steps. <br />Action: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.