Agenda - Council - 08/23/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

,'11 ii II ,]1 II II ,]1 II II ,]1 II II 11 II II ]! II II TO; Planning and ~oning Commission FROM= City Staff RE: Rum River Hills The public hearing as outlined in the City Codes states that it pertains to only the preliminary P.U.D. plan. Accordingly, the developer does not have to have final development plans for this hearing. Consequently, at this meeting :the'Planning and Zoning Commission will be considering the follow- ing: " a) Lots"- Define lot boundaries by bearings and distances. b) Density - This should be resolved at this meeting. It should be noted that we can't-grant a variance to density and further any. changes would require an amendment to both the City Ordinance (PUD) and Comprehensive Plan and with latter requiring Metro Council approval. It is the opinion of the City Staff that the Rum River Hills PUD would be entitled to 17 single fandly lots plus he will be entitled to a 10% in- crease in number of lots as per City Ordinance plus an addi- tional lot if White Pines park lands is included in PUD which translates into three additional lots or a total of 20 lots. c) White Pines Park - It is recommended this be acquired by purchasing of land and inasmuch as this will be a public course the land won't really be lost. d) Rezonin~ - We have discussed this issue with Mr. Bob Ryan at the Metro Council and they agree with us that inasmuch as we're not increasing RB-2 area but only changing configuration of it, we do not need Metro approval. We.wilt have to make a change to our zoning map by resolution which the~ will receive a copy of. ~ ~. e) Covenants - We should consider having a covenant on this PUD and consider having the following items in this covenant: 1) Any resident having a dog would require a kennel. 2) No outside storage of vehicles, wood piles, recreation equipment, etc.