My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
#15-09-216
Ramsey
>
Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2015 - All Res Executed
>
#15-09-216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2015 8:41:54 AM
Creation date
9/28/2015 8:41:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 15-09-216 <br /> <br /> <br />The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for <br />Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 (District), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, <br />Subdivision 3 are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 15 is a renewal and renovation district as defined in M.S., <br />Section 469.174, Subd. 10a. <br /> <br />The District consists of three parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for commercial/industrial purposes. <br />At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved <br />or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 20 percent of the buildings in the District are <br />structurally substandard, and 30 percent of the other buildings require substantial renovation or clearance. <br />(See Appendix F of the TIF Plan.) <br /> <br />2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected <br />to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased <br />market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing <br />would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after <br />subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District <br />permitted by the TIF Plan. <br /> <br />The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely <br />through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact <br />that the redevelopment proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. Due to the <br />high cost of redevelopment on the parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, and the cost of <br />financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax <br />increment financing. <br /> <br />The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax <br />increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed <br />development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of <br />the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the cost of site <br />improvements, clean-up, and capping of existing thermal wells, add to the total redevelopment cost. The <br />City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without <br />substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. <br /> <br /> Therefore, the City concludes as follows: <br /> <br />a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without <br />the use of tax increment financing is $0. <br /> <br />b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be $3,933,000. <br /> <br />c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted <br />by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $888,804. <br /> <br />d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no <br />alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $3,044,196 (the <br />amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. <br />Resolution #15-09-216 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.