My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 05/19/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2015
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 05/19/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:01:26 PM
Creation date
10/15/2015 8:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
05/19/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board Member Bentz stated that he would still like to see a price tag put on water with irrigation <br />water at a different rate then potable water. He thinks the best way to get people's attention is to <br />let them know this is how much water is being used and it's going to cost them this much more. <br />This would take the issue/costs away from the state and concentrate it locally. He stated that <br />everyone needs to know the costs and that everyone is paying for it. <br />Commissioner Bauer stated that is a good point. He stated that those on their own well are not <br />concerned because they are not paying for the water, but it is costing the community. He talked <br />about making those with their own private well aware of the issue. <br />City Planner Anderson stated when the topsoil ordinance was adopted there was a discussion <br />about the ordinance being for those on City services or City-wide. The decision was to make it <br />city-wide because citizens are all drawing from the same aquifer. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that this is a starting point for framing discussions at an upcoming <br />public meeting. <br />Board Member Bentz asked the Planning Commission if when they get blueprints and layouts, <br />they use modern best management practices for landscaping, lighting, roofing, etc. <br />Commissioner Bauer answered that they don't get into this with residential developments. The <br />multi -family proposals do need to present this information. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that this would be another benefit of the Board actively taking part <br />in the review of the land use applications. If an issue is not in the zoning code, it may not be <br />required but there can be advisory comments. If a consistent message is coming forward, then <br />maybe it's time to look at an ordinance amendment. <br />City Council Liaison LeTourneau suggested looking at what the City can do to set best practice <br />standards for the community to follow. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill asked if he was talking about City operations. <br />City Council Liaison LeTourneau answered affirmatively. <br />Chairperson Levine stated he didn't want to add a lot of cost to proposed projects and that there <br />needs to be a balance. <br />Chairperson Stodola stated that we could educate developers on the long-term cost savings. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that looking at if the City can create incentives to encourage some <br />of the techniques to be incorporated into a project could be a goal. <br />Commissioner Brauer explained points -based zoning that has been adopted by some cities. He <br />stated that if we had a points -based system, developers could be rewarded for green space and <br />less parking. <br />Commissioner Andrusko asked if the City participates in the Green Steps Program. <br />Environmental Policy Board / April 20, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.