My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 05/19/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2015
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 05/19/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:01:26 PM
Creation date
10/15/2015 8:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
05/19/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill stated that two tools used in addition to the Strategic <br />Plan for financial planning are the Capital Improvement Program and the annual budget. <br />Planning starts with Strategic plan, then the CIP and is funded by the annual budget. The CIP is <br />a planning document. <br />Board Member Bentz asked about the City saying there is too much park property and looking at <br />ways to sell it off. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that the City did complete an inventory of city -owned land and <br />identified land as not serving a purpose to be marketed for sale. <br />Board Member Bentz asked about a requirement for set aside for development purposes. <br />City Planner Anderson responded that there is a park dedication requirement that can be satisfied <br />with land or cash or a combination of both. The general policy is to satisfy it with cash. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that City Planner Anderson's statement was <br />correct that it is cash in lieu of land. It has to meet the master park and trail plan. He suggested <br />looking at the term "cluster ordinances" and refining it or getting it out of the Comprehensive <br />Plan. He explained the cluster concept. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated that in the past, there was a misunderstanding between clustering as <br />a strategy for developing green space and clustering as a way of cramming a lot of houses <br />together that was never resolved. <br />Board Member Bentz stated that a lot of people looked at it as poverty neighborhoods. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that this issue warrants some future <br />refinement and strategy. Commission and Board Members agreed. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated that it was ambiguous at the time and it hasn't gotten any less <br />ambiguous. <br />Board Member Bentz asked if there was a moratorium. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the ordinance was repealed. The only <br />tool that can be used is a planned unit development. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated that he liked Board Member Valentine' s point about sustainability <br />and that that value wasn't stressed enough in the last plan. He thinks it is crucial now to <br />community survival. <br />Board Member Valentine agreed with Commissioner Brauer and stated that there are plenty of <br />people that think it is a dirty word. <br />Commissioner Brauer spoke about the need for a discussion on what do we mean by it and how <br />do we plan on doing about it. He talked about reviving the Andover ordinance model. He talked <br />Environmental Policy Board / April 20, 2015 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.