Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Policy Board (EPB) 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 08/17/2015 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Revisit the Question to be Asked as Part of the Citizen Engagement Process for the Environmental <br />Protection/Resource Management Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan <br />Purpose/Background: <br />At the May meeting, the Board developed a question that would be used to invite residents to participate in the <br />review of and potential update to the Environmental Protection/Resource Management Chapter of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. The consensus of the Board was to use the following language: "How do natural resources <br />and the environment align with your perception of land use practices and the vision within the City?". <br />Following the EPB's May meeting, Staff received some general feedback regarding the Citizen Engagement Process <br />and questions used to invite the public to participate. This was not specific to the EPB's question, but in response to <br />questions being developed for other components or citizen engagement sessions. In addition, this feedback <br />regarding the desired structure of these questions was discussed in a Joint Work Session with the Planning <br />Commission and City Council. <br />The primary feedback received was that questions used in this process should have a positive tone and be simple <br />enough that everyone could answer regardless of their technical knowledge of the subject. While the question <br />regarding natural resources was not specifically addressed, after contemplating the feedback and reassessing the <br />question the Board developed, Staff believes it may be appropriate to consider a revised question. <br />It is Staffs intent to route each of the proposed questions related to the various components of the Comprehensive <br />Plan Update project through City Council as a quick check -in before proceeding. Thus, Staff wanted to revisit this <br />question with the Board to consider a potential alternative question that could be posed. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Based on the Board's discussion from the May meeting, there was a desire to ensure that whatever terminology was <br />used be all encompassing. Considering the general discussion that has already occurred, and based on feedback <br />Staff has received on formatting questions for the citizen engagement process, Staff would recommend the <br />following question be used to invite the public to participate in a public workshop to assess the current <br />Environmental Protection/Resource Management Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and to inform Staff if there <br />are needed updates/revisions: <br />"What value do natural resources and environmental sustainability add to your neighborhood?" <br />In addition to a public workshop, there are other opportunities to solicit input from the public on this Chapter of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. These could include collecting input from attendees at the one of the summer concert series <br />events at the amphitheater in The Draw as well as at the EPB's booth at Happy Days. <br />Funding Source: <br />This case is being handled as part of Staffs regular duties. <br />Action: <br />