Laserfiche WebLink
Review of Buildable Area Concerns for Policy Development <br />Background <br />In recent years, the City has received feedback from certain property owners concerned about buildable <br />area on their parcels after factoring out areas encumbered with wetlands, floodplains, and storm sewer <br />infrastructure. Oftentimes, this concern is raised when the homeowner submits a Building Permit for <br />common homeowner improvements, such as a deck and/or an accessory building, and it is discovered <br />that the proposed improvement would encroach into an easement and/or possibly into a wetland or <br />designated floodplain. In these instances, the only way for the property owner to proceed with the <br />proposed improvement(s) is by entering into an Encroachment Agreement with the City, and, in certain <br />instances, receiving approval by the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO). <br />The initial construction of the principal structure (home) on the property met all applicable bulk standards, <br />including setbacks. However, setbacks only apply to the property boundaries. Thus, for some lots that <br />contain floodplain, wetland, and/or storm sewer infrastructure, the actual buildable area can be <br />significantly restricted and may limit a future homeowner's ability to make future improvements or <br />establish a 'useable' backyard. Since the principal structure met all applicable bulk standards, the City <br />could not legally prohibit or withhold the issuance of a Building Permit, even if it was evident that future <br />conflicts, such as installation of a deck or potential placement of fill to create additional 'useable' rear <br />yard area, would arise (even when it was within several feet of the rear wall of a home). <br />Objective <br />The City Council has directed Staff to work with the EPB and the Planning Commission to develop ideas <br />that may resolve, or at least reduce, the number of instances in which some homeowners may <br />encounter as a result of the proximity of the principal structure to a wetland, floodplain, and/or storm <br />sewer pipe. It is acknowledged that this process would hopefully address this issue for any lots created <br />in the future and will not necessarily resolve an issue with an existing lot of record. <br />Potential Options/Outcomes <br />Minimum Buildable Area Requirement <br />City Code does have minimum standards for lot size: 10,800 sq. ft. in the R-1 MUSA district and 2.5 acres <br />in the R-1 Rural Developing district. However, there is no minimum buildable area requirement. There <br />are a number of examples in the MUSA district in which there are % to 1 acre lots with less than 10,800 <br />sq. ft. of buildable area due to wetlands, storm sewer infrastructure, and/or floodplain. However, since <br />lot shape can vary greatly, this may not be the best tool to minimize future conflicts. <br />Principal Structure Setback <br />Presently, there is no required setback from a wetland, storm sewer pipe, or floodplain. Wetlands and <br />storm sewer infrastructure are encumbered by drainage and utility easements, and no structure is <br />permitted within an easement; however, without a specified minimum separation, a home could be <br />constructed up to the easement boundary. A principal structure setback, if implemented, would at least <br />ensure a certain distance from a wetland/floodplain/storm sewer pipe, which could accommodate a <br />future improvement such as a deck or detached accessory building. Additionally, this would also ensure <br />a more reasonable, 'usable' rear yard, which may help reduce instances of fill being placed in restricted <br />areas. <br />Miscellaneous <br />This section is included to indicate that there may also be other potential solutions that merit <br />consideration as part of this policy discussion. <br />