My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/05/04
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Environmental Policy Task Force
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
04/05/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2025 2:25:39 PM
Creation date
4/28/2004 10:40:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Environmental Policy Task Force
Document Date
04/05/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Hovey talked about the ecologic, social and economic value of wetlands. He reviewed the <br />existing wetland protection programs in Ramsey. Mr. Hovey then reviewed wetland buffers, <br />their purpose and potential effectiveness. Buffers are a zone of undisturbed area around a <br />wetland. A very important implementation tool for wetlands is physical signing of the wetland <br />buffer area. Mr. Hovey then went on to review the interaction of ground and surface water. He <br />provided a list of resources on wetland buffers. <br /> <br />Case #2: Presentation by Remi Stone, Builders Association of the Twin Cities <br /> <br />Ms. Stone reviewed the purpose, goals, objectives, timeline of the Metro Area Buffer Study <br />sponsored by Metropolitan Council, private developers, National Association of Home Builders, <br />the University of Minnesota and area watershed districts. <br /> <br />Ms. Stone stated that she would recommended that buffers be measured from the ordinary high <br />water mark. She also recommends signing the buffer on site, not just on a paper plan. On-site <br />signage puts the public on notice that the buffer exists, that it must remain natural, and that they <br />can't replace it with turf grass <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda opened the meeting up for questions and answers. <br /> <br />Mr. McDilda asked if there are any boiler plate wetland buffer ordinances. Ms. Stone stated that <br />she would provide the EPTF with a model put out by the Builders Association. She also <br />recommended contacting the League of Minnesota Cities and some of the watershed districts. <br /> <br />Mr. Bacon noted that there should be monitoring of the animal life in the water body as well as <br />the plant life around the water body. At what point do we address how herbicides and pesticides <br />are impacting the waterways? <br /> <br />Mr. Hovey responded that you can tell the health of a stream by the life that is in the stream. <br />Hennepin County is utilizing high school students to study these issues; it gets the children <br />involved in the planet they live in. He hopes that one of Ramsey's sites could be included in the <br />Metro Buffer Study because it is important to have some scientific data from the sand plain. <br /> <br />Mr. Hovey stated that earlier studies stated that the larger the buffer, the better; now they are <br />leaning towards formulas based on slope, etc. <br /> <br />Ms. Stone stated that slope is critical; use is also a variable that is part of the formula. <br /> <br />Mr. McDilda stated that existing development around existing wetlands is a problem as far as <br />trying to get a buffer zone after the fact. What can the City do to reclaim what has been lost? <br /> <br />Mr. Max inquired as to the importance placed on ordinance consistency with neighboring <br />communities. <br /> <br />EPTF April 5, 2004 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.