Laserfiche WebLink
162nd Lane West of Ramsey Blvd. <br />This area is un-platted and does not have drainage and utility easements. The residents at 6855 162nd Lane NW <br />contacted the City about the high water elevation in the adjacent wetland. There are a series of wetlands in the back <br />yards north of this parcel. All of the surrounding area is up to 20 feet higher than the wetlands. <br />156th Lane East of TH 47/St Francis Blvd. <br />This area is platted and has some drainage and utility easements. The residents at 5220 156th Lane NW contacted <br />the City about the level of the pond in their back yard. The ponding area did not have an outlet when the plat was <br />recorded in 1973. A pipe was installed under TH 47 in 2003 to provide a stormwater outlet from a new subdivision. <br />A pipe was also installed along 155h Lane and along lot lines from the wetland east of TH 47 to this pond. An <br />outlet for this pond was installed with the Highlands at River Park Project in 2003. This pipe outlet is lower than <br />the pipe installed with the Reilley Estates plat in 1978. The pond at 5220 15611 Lane NW does drain; however, the <br />water level has to be higher than the invert of the pipe downstream. The previous owners of the property came <br />before the City Council in 2011 concerned about the proximity of the standing water to their septic system drain <br />field. The City paid to have the drain field relocated outside of the drainage easement. The water was contained <br />within the drainage and utility easement in 2014. <br />During discussions at the March 31st Public Works Committee meeting, it was determined that it would be <br />cost -prohibitive to address all such drainage concerns throughout the City. It was therefore confirmed that the <br />Gibbon Street area was experiencing the most significant issues and that Staff should research drainage solutions <br />for this area first, and that the results of the research should be brought back to the Public Works Committee for <br />further consideration. Attached are minutes from the March 31, 2015 Public Works Committee meeting for <br />reference. <br />On June 16, 2015, Staff presented four possible options for alleviating localized flooding issues in the Gibbon <br />Street area to the Public Works Committee. A figure showing the location and alignment in plan view of each of the <br />four options is attached. A figure showing the proposed profile view of each option, including elevations, is also <br />attached. The four options are as follows: <br />Option #1: This option requires installing a pipe in an existing drainage and utility easement. The initial plan was to <br />install approximately 800 feet of pipe by jacking to avoid large trees within the easement and cutting a deep trench <br />through Iguana Street. This was determined to be infeasible after further investigation for the following reasons. <br />The jacking pit would need to be placed in one wetland and the receiving pit and pipe fusing area would need to be <br />in the second area. Both areas are over 400 feet from the nearest road. Access would require acquisition of <br />additional easements. The fused pipe may tend to sink into the wetland prior to being pulled back. The City did a <br />project in 2012 where the boring machine was placed on upland in an existing easement extending to the street. The <br />welding of the pipe was done on planking extended from an existing road. The jacked length was approximately <br />800 feet. The total project cost was $160,000. The Gibbon street project would require additional easements and <br />restoration of all disturbed lawn surfaces. <br />Option #2: This option requires cleaning the existing County Ditch that runs north of this development. This option <br />is not feasible because it would require lowering the existing surface area of some wetlands up to 2 feet which is <br />not permitted under the Wetland Conservation Act. <br />Option #3: This option considered the suggestion of the property owners at 17421 Gibbon Street NW for using a <br />different set of drainage and utility easements to provide drainage to the west. Evaluation of this route indicated that <br />there are two high areas that would need to have pipe installed and that there is minimal elevation difference <br />between the beginning and ending points. This route is not feasible. <br />Option #4: Staff evaluated extending storm sewer pipe south in the Gibbon Street right-of-way, then west along the <br />173rd Avenue right-of-way to provide drainage from the area to County Ditch 66. This appears to be feasible. The <br />location and elevation of existing small utilities must be determined to better define the scope of this process. The <br />normal water level of the existing wetland east of Gibbon Street should also be determined when evaluating the <br />overall feasibility of this project. The pipe installation for this option is estimated to cost $275,000 to $300,000. <br />