My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:11:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2015 1:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/27/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Tim Gladhill, Kurt Ulrich, Dean Kapler, and all other interested parties <br />From: Michael Healy <br />Re: Fire safety and Rental Properties <br />According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 96% of American homes had <br />smoke alarms in 2010. However, 20% of homes with smoke alarms do not have even a single functioning <br />smoke alarm. The leading cause of the devices being rendered nonfunctional is nuisance deactivations <br />where the alarm was disabled because it was going off inappropriately and annoying the occupant. <br />According to the NFPA, many of these nuisances are easily remedied by simply moving the alarms <br />further away from stoves and other heat sources. Another option is for kitchens to be protected by <br />photoelectric smoke alarms instead of ionization alarms since they respond to different stimuli and are <br />less likely to raise false alarms with cooking heat. The NFPA reports that in cases where a home fire <br />resulted in a death, 38% of the fatalities occurred in homes without alarms and 24% occurred in homes <br />where at least one alarm was present but failed to operate. Fully two thirds of fire deaths occurred in <br />houses that were not under the protection of smoke alarms. The NFPA further notes that smoke alarm <br />failures usually result from missing, disconnected, or dead batteries. They also explain that smoke <br />detectors are generally only reliable for about ten years and then should be replaced. It seems unlikely <br />that the average renter would be interested in investing the time and money to ever upgrade the smoke <br />detectors in a unit that they are renting. A renter would also probably be much more likely to simply <br />disconnect a smoke alarm rather than attempt a more complex response to nuisance alarms such as <br />moving the alarm (which would require installation) or changing to a different smoke detector <br />technology. A case could be made that it would be in a city's best interest to at least occasionally <br />perform inspections of rental properties with at least one of the goals being to ensure that landlords are <br />being diligent to ensure that the smoke alarm systems are working properly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.