Laserfiche WebLink
More information can be found online at www.cityoframsey.com/shoreland. <br />Rum River Shoreland Inventory/Wild and Scenic Overlay Inspections <br />Annually, the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (WMO) tours shoreland areas of the Rum <br />River and Mississippi River. Most recently, the WMO has been alternating years between the Rum River and the <br />Mississippi River. Primarily, the WMO focuses on erosion issues that contribute to the degradation of water quality. <br />The WMO also uses this opportunity to invite City staff that administers zoning code/land development regulations <br />to review compliance with the State's Wild and Scenic River Overlay District standards. <br />Overall, the City notes a predominance of shoreland owners are in compliance with the overlay standards as it <br />relates to the placement of docks, decks, and stairwells as well as vegetative management. In follow up with WMO <br />and DNR Staff, discussion has focused on the administration of permitting of docks within the riverways. The <br />overlay district requires that these docks be approved through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit before the <br />dock is placed for the very first time. This does not need to be renewed annually. <br />Staff did note multiple violations of size of stairways and landings leading to docks. Additionally, it is further noted <br />that Staff was only able to observe approximately 70% of the shoreland parcels, as many of the shoreland properties <br />along the Rum River are located along backwaters of the Rum River, making it difficult and/or time consuming to <br />navigate by pontoon. <br />Financial Resources Available <br />The City and its residents have access to financial assistance through a variety of sources. Primarily, the City <br />directs interested residents to the Anoka Conservation District for these types of inquiries. There are several <br />opportunities within the following categories related to soil and water conservation: <br />1. Lakeshore Restoration or Stabilization <br />2. Streambank Restoration or Stabilization <br />3. Rain Gardens <br />4. Wildlife Habitat Improvement <br />5. Agricultural Conservation <br />6. Conservation Easement <br />7. Land Acquisition <br />8. Ecosystem Restoration <br />Many of the current resources have a significant resident match requirement, making it a barrier to many of the <br />documented issues. In discussions with the Anoka Conservation District, it was noted that a more detailed shoreline <br />inventory of the Mississippi River would help identify and prioritize problem areas, which would then potentially <br />qualify these areas for additional funding sources with lowered match requirements. <br />The impetus of this topic is at the request of a Property Owner along the Mississippi River. This Owner has noted a <br />potential erosion concern along the Mississippi River and is concerned about allowable design standards for <br />stabilization. The Owner has been invited to the meeting to express his concerns. <br />As part of these discussion of all three topics above, the conversation regarding use of rock rip -rap for shoreline <br />stabilization becomes a primary topic. The perception of residents often times is that rock rip -rap is not an <br />acceptable improvement under any circumstances. However, both the Anoka Conservation District and Minnesota <br />DNR do allow these types of improvements if it can be demonstrated that other best management practices are not a <br />practical solution. In short, rock rip -rap is not the preferred solution and is only considered if other options are <br />explored first. <br />Funding Source: <br />