My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:11:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2015 1:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/27/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lour 1111.1siion: To work together to reiposibty grow our community, and to provide quality, coat -effective, and efficient government ierrlcas. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 10/27/2015 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Introduce Ordinance #15-15 Amending City Code Section 117-1 (Definitions) Chapter 117, Article II, Division 4, <br />Subdivision III (Floodplain Overlay Districts) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />In 1979, the City enrolled in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by adopting floodplain regulations and <br />Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for the community. The Flood <br />Boundary and Floodway Maps and FIRMs currently in effect are dated November 1, 1979. The community has <br />grown substantially since the late 1970s, and thus, the maps lack much of the current street network. <br />The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been systematically updating floodplain maps across <br />the state and has recently completed new maps for Anoka County. If the City desires to remain in the NFIP, the <br />floodplain standards must be amended to adopt the new maps. Per the attached Letter of Final Determination, for the <br />City to remain in the NFIP, the existing floodplain regulations must be amended to comply with federal regulations, <br />which includes both text amendments as well as adopted the updated FIRMs and Flood Insurance Study (FIS). <br />The floodplain standards are designed to minimize structural damage as a result of large scale floods, oftentimes <br />referred to as the 100-year flood (or Regional Flood or Special Flood Hazard Area), by prohibiting the placement of <br />structures within designated floodways and by requiring either flood -proofing and/or the use of fill to elevate a <br />structure to a certain elevation if within the flood fringe areas. Structures located within a designated floodplain are <br />required to be covered by flood insurance (federal mandate). If a community opted not to participate in the NFIP, <br />then federally backed mortgages would not be an option for properties in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) as <br />flood insurance would not be available (to any property owner). Additionally, if the City opted not to continue in <br />the NFIP, it would lose its eligibility for federal disaster also. <br />Notification: <br />The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the City's official newspaper, the Anoka County UnionHerald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, as the State Coordinating Agency for the NFIP, has provided a <br />model ordinance for consideration. Attached to this case is that model ordinance developed by the DNR that was <br />used to guide Ramsey's local ordinance This model includes commentary identifying those sections that are <br />mandatory or optional, as well as some brief, basic background for some of the provisions. It should be noted that a <br />majority of the provisions in the model ordinance already exist in the City's current floodplain regulation. Attached <br />is a marked up version of the model ordinance that includes cross references to the City's current floodplain <br />regulations to help illustrate what language already exists within City Code. Also attached to this case is a summary <br />of optional provisions that don't already exist in City Code as well as a brief statement as to whether or not it was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.