My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:11:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2015 1:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/27/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(a) Designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral <br />movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the <br />effects of buoyancy; <br />(b) Constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; <br />(c) Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; and <br />(d) Constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and <br />other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or <br />accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. <br />These standards go beyond the designated boundaries of floodplains into any land that may be <br />subjected to flooding. If part of a subdivision, these areas most likely may be encumbered by Drainage <br />and Utility Easements, which would prohibit the placement of structures in these areas. As this extends <br />beyond the minimum requirements, Staff has not included this language in the draft Ordinance. <br />A Farm Fence, as defined in 117-1, would require a Zoning Permit but is not considered a structure when <br />administering this Subdivision. <br />City Code presently does allow for certain types of fences to be used strictly for agricultural activities <br />and the raising of livestock. This type of a fence (generally barbless wire secured to posts with or <br />without the capability to carry an electric charge) does not present a barrier to flood flows (unlike <br />privacy fences or even chain link) and thus, Staff has included this language in the draft Ordinance so <br />that it can be used within the Floodway District to enclose pasture/grazing areas. <br />(1) Factors Used in Decision -Making. In passing upon conditional use applications, the City Council will <br />consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this Subdivision, and those factors <br />identified in Section 117-189 (c)(5). <br />(2) Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. The City Council may attach such conditions to the <br />granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. <br />Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: <br />a. Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. <br />b. Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. <br />c. Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. <br />d. Requirements for construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, <br />levees, and other protective measures. <br />e. Floodproofing measures, in accordance with the MN State Building Code and this <br />Subdivision. The applicant must submit a plan or document certified by a registered <br />professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the <br />regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. <br />While optional, these provisions help provide guidance for both the City and potential applicants when <br />considering requests for Conditional Use Permits within a floodplain. Staff has included this language in <br />the draft Ordinance under Sec. 117-189 (d)(2) and (3). <br />If any nonconforming use or structure experiences a repetitive loss, as defined above, it must not be <br />reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. <br />This is optional provision that would require a nonconforming use or structure that experiences damage <br />meeting the definition of Repetitive Loss twice within a 10-year period to either not be reconstructed or <br />be reconstructed only in conformity with provisions within this Subdivision. This goes beyond the <br />minimum standards and thus, Staff has not included this in the draft Ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.