Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill answered the medians mostly are at the request of <br /> the developer and sometimes by request of the neighborhood. The purpose is to improve the <br /> quality of the neighborhood. The City does not have the manpower to maintain them. If the City <br /> takes on a few to maintain, then the City will receive requests to maintain more. As noted in the <br /> previous agenda item, a policy is needed to determine responsibilities of maintenance. <br /> Councilmember Shryock suggested while designing these medians keep in mind the daylilies <br /> will spread. The medians could become a self-maintained area once the daylilies mature. <br /> Adding rock or other landscape material may inhibit weed growth. She pointed out having low <br /> maintenance plantings in the middle of the median should be considered. <br /> Chairperson Riley clarified the question related to this item is whether river rock should be used <br /> or another substance that will be discussed and approved with Public Works. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed this is the question before the Committee. <br /> Councilmember Johns asked if the City owns this median, and sought confirmation that the <br /> homeowner wanted to work with a landscaper working pro bono. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Riemer responded the City does own the median and confirmed <br /> the use of a pro bono landscaper. He acknowledged the City will still own the median. <br /> Councilmember Shryock reasoned if there is a sidewalk, part of the maintenance responsibility <br /> lies with the homeowners. Why not use this policy with medians. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill replied part of the reason is assessments. Being the <br /> medians are in the middle, they become more of a public entity. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Shryock, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to recommend that the <br /> City Council direct Sweetbay Ridge to propose an alternative base material acceptable to the <br /> Public Works Superintendent and subsequently allow said private improvement within the right <br /> of way for 161st Avenue. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Johns and Shryock. Voting <br /> No: None. <br /> 5.03: Consider Vacating Permanent Road Easement over a portion of 14911 Ramsey Blvd <br /> and the Parcel to the North with a Property Identification Number (PIN) of 22-32- <br /> 25-33-0017 <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and noted the adjacent <br /> property owner is willing to assume responsibility for this easement. He commented the sign for <br /> Ramsey Market lies in the right of way. Election signs are frequently put in this easement. He <br /> said some residents are aware this is a public right of way and call to express their concerns. <br /> There are a lot of unnecessary disagreements with this parcel. If this request is approved, it will <br /> Public Works Committee/ October 20, 2015 <br /> Page 4 of 10 <br />