My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/20/1975 - Joint with Planning
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1975
>
Minutes - Council - 02/20/1975 - Joint with Planning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:02:42 PM
Creation date
4/30/2004 11:01:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Joint with Planning
Document Date
02/20/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />City Council <br />City of Ramsey <br />February 20, 1975 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />b) The present 5% limit on increases in market value of <br />homes creates inequities'between individual property owners <br />within the same community and also creates inequities between <br />communities that contribute to the same overlapping taxing <br />districts, such as the school district, county, metro, etc.. <br />As a result of inflation, assessors in Anoka County are.using <br />guidelines based on sales ratios which result in actual market <br />value increases since the limit was imposed of between 20% and <br />30%, including proposed 1975 changes. 'The 5% limit per year <br />results in taxable value increases of only 15% and the limit <br />does not apply to new construction. Using actual cases in the <br />City of Ramsey this law can result in a tax difference between <br />identical market value homes in excess of $200.00 per year, <br />depending on when. the home was constructed. This inequity <br />should be removed. Further, communities within the school <br />district and the County which have subst'antial numbers o'f <br />new homes constructed are paying more than their share of <br />taxes because of the arbitrary limitation on existing homes <br />but not on new construction. <br /> <br />It should be noted that removal of the limit without some <br />limitation on the amount of tax increase will. also create <br />problems which should be considered in drafting changes in <br />the current system. Removal of the 5% limitation inequity <br />should be staged so that individual hardships do not occur <br />during the transition back to a system based on real market <br />value. <br /> <br />That the City Council support legislation tha~ would remove <br />the current 5% limitation on increases in taxable value of <br />property, provided that such legislation also limit the <br />resulting increase on individual properties. <br /> <br />c) Resources for local governments now are derived from <br />three basic sources: <br /> <br />(2) <br />(3) <br /> <br />State Local Government Aids <br />Federal Revenue Sharing <br />Property Taxes <br /> <br />It is important that both the State and Federal governments <br />maintain their contributions at a pace at least equal to the <br />rate of inflation to prevent further burdens on the property <br />tax to maintain local government services. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.