Laserfiche WebLink
hearing and reviewed the proposed amendment at their April 1, 2004 meeting. They <br />recommended the City Council introduce and adopt the MU-PUD ordinance with the language <br />change, however, the vote was split as some of the commissioners felt it was too flexible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak indicated she had concerns with flexibility and feels comfortable with the <br />statement "to provide for an adequate mixture of commercial and residential uses and in no case <br />shall a development contain 100% of any one use." <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen concurred. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if there would be PUD's with all commercial uses. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald replied a PUD could not have 100% commercial use. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember KUrak, to introduce an ordinance <br />amending the MU-PUD district. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Kurak, Pearson, <br />Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cook. <br /> <br />Case#10: Introduce Ordinance to Amend Landscape Requirements in the B-1 <br /> Business, B-2 Business, E-1 Employment, and E-2 Employment Zoning <br /> Districts <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik advised staff recommends approval of the proposed <br />landscaping amendments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen asked if the EPTF had any input into the ordinance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik responded in the negative. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen commented it is very good that this ordinance is being reviewed and <br />modified. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to introduce an <br />ordinance to amend the landscape requirements in the B-1 Business, B-2 Business, E-1 <br />Employment, and E-2 Employment Districts. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Pearson, Kurak, Elvig, <br />Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cook. <br /> <br />Case #11: Consider Establishing Vision Clearance Triangle into City Code <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman questioned if this would constitute a taking. <br /> <br />P98 <br /> <br />City Council/April 13, 2004 <br /> Page 28 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />